•  
  •  
 

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica

Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-2662 Mańko Rafał

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to contribute to the on-going discussion, both in legal theory and in comparative law, concerning the status of Central Europe and its delimitation from other legal regions in Europe, notably Romano-Germanic Western Europe but also Eastern Europe and Eurasia. The paper adopts the methodological perspective of critical legal geography, understood as a strand of critical jurisprudence laying at the interstices of spatial justice studies, critical geography, comparative law, sociology of law and legal history. The paper proceeds by identifying the notion of Central Europe with reference to a specific list of countries, then proposes a number of objective criteria for delimitng Central Europe and applies them in order to highlight the difference between Central Europe and other adjacent legal regions. Following that, the paper enquires as to whether Central Europe should be deemed to be a ‘legal family’, a ‘legal union’ or simply a ‘legal space’ or ‘space of legal culture’.

Keywords

critical jurisprudence, critical legal geography, legal theory, comparative law, legal families, legal taxonomy, Central Europe

References

Ajani, Gianmaria. 2006. Sistemi giuridici comparati. Torino: Giappichelli.

Berg, Lawrence. 2010. “Critical Human Geography”. In Encyclopedia of Geography. Edited by Barney Wharf. SAGE Publications. https://www.academia.edu/2044691/Critical_Human_Geography [Accessed: 23 August 2018].

Best, Ulrich. 2009. “Critical Geography”. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Vol. 2. 345–357. Edited by Rob Kitchin, Nigel Thrift. Oxord: Elsevier. https://www.academia.edu/3620477/Critical_Geography._In_Kitchin_R_Thrift_N_eds_The_International_Encyclopedia_of_Human_Geography_volume_2_pp._345–357._Oxford_Elsevier [Accessed: 23 August 2018].

Bieś-Srokosz, Paulina. 2018. “Legal Transplants in Administrative Law: Polish Experiences”. In Law, Space and the Political: An East-West Perspective. 85–93. Edited by Paulina Bieś-Srokosz, Rafał Mańko, Jacek Srokosz. Częstochowa: Podobiński Publishing House.

Bocşan, Mircea-Dan. 2006. “L’oeuvre de codification – enjeu de la modernisation du droit roumain”. In Modernisierung durch Transfer im 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhundert. 33–46. Edited by Tomasz Giaro. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

Cercel, Cosmin. 2018. Towards a Jurisprudence of State Communism: Law and the Failure of Revolution. London: Routledge.

Čepulo, Dalibor. 2006. “Building of the Modern Legal System in Croatia 1848–1918 in the Centre-periphery Perspective”. In Modernisieuring durch Transfer im 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhundert. 47–91. Edited by Tomasz Giaro. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

Chmielnicki, Paweł. 2012. “Podejmowanie decyzji w warunkach prawnego i prawniczego potopu informacyjnego”. Roczniki Administracji i Prawa. Teoria i Praktyka 12: 17–24.

Collins, Hugh. 1982. Marxism and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

David, René. Brierley, John. 1968. Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law. London: Stevens and Sons.

Diamant, Betinion. Vasile Luncean. 1986. “Note on the History of Romanian Law”. Journal of Legal History 7(1): 98–101.

Fiedorczyk, Piotr. 2009. “Czechosłowacka droga do kodyfikacji prawa rodzinnego 1919–1949. Z dziejów współpracy z Polską”. In Państwo, prawo, społeczeństwo w dziejach Europy Środkowej. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Józefowi Ciągwie w siedemdziesięciolecie urodzin. 184–196. Edited by Adam Lityński. Katowice–Kraków: Wydawnictwo i Drukarnia Towarzystwo Słowaków w Polsce.

Fiedorczyk, Piotr. 2011. “Polski kodeks rodzinny z 1950 r. Czy przełom?” Zeszyty Prawnicze UKSW 11(2): 129–151.

Fiedorczyk, Piotr. 2012. “Počátky socialistického rodinného práva”. In Vývoj soukromého práva na území českých zemí (I dil). 549–600. Edited by Ladislav Vojáček, Jaromír Tauchen, Karel Schelle. Brno: Masarykova Universita.

Fiedorczyk, Piotr. 2013. “Debata nad uchwaleniem polsko-czechosłowackiego prawa rodzinnego w czechosłowackim Zgromadzeniu Narodowym w 1949 r.” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 19: 131–141.

Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina. Bálasz Fekete. Eds. 2017. Central and Eastern European Socio-Political and Legal Transition Revisited. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Helios, Joanna. Wioletta Jedlecka. Współczesne oblicza przemocy. Zagadnienia wybrane. Wrocław: Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa.

Husa, Jakko. 2015. A New Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford: Hart.

Jędrejek, Grzegorz. 2001. “Polski kodeks zobowiązań z 1933 roku. Powstanie, źródła, znaczenie dla europejskiego prawa obligacyjnego”. Roczniki Nauk Prawnych 11(1): 47–68.

Krzynówek, Jerzy. 2003. “Tradycje prawne Europy”. In Prawo polskie a prawo Unii Europejskiej. 23–34. Edited by Eugeniusz Piontek. Warszawa: Liber.

Kühn, Zdeněk. 2004. “Worlds Apart: Western and Central European Judicial Culture at the Onset of the European Enlargement”. American Journal of Comparative Law 52(3): 531–567

Kühn, Zdeněk. 2011. The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation? Leiden-Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

Mälksoo, Lauri. Wolfgang Benedek. Eds. 2017. Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mańko, Rafał. 2007. “Is the Socialist Legal Tradition ‘Dead and Buried’? The Continuity of Certain Elements of Socialist Legal Culture in Polish Civil Procedure”. In Private Law and the Many Cultures of Europe. 83–103. Edited by Thomas Wilhelmsson. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

Mańko, Rafał. 2008. “Unifikacja europejskiego prawa prywatnego z perspektywy społeczeństwa polskiego: przyczynek do dyskusji”. Nowa Europa 2: 35–84.

Mańko, Rafał. 2012. “Resistance towards the Unfair Terms Directive in Poland: The Interaction between the Consumer Acquis and a Post-Socialist Legal Culture”. In European Consumer Protection: Theory and Practice. 412–434. Edited by James Devenney, Mel Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mańko, Rafał. 2015. “The Cooperative Member’s Proprietary Right to an Apartment: A Legal Survival of the Period of Actually Existing Socialism in Polish Private Law”. Zeszyty Prawnicze 15(4): 147–176.

Mańko, Rafał. 2016a. “Transformacja ustrojowa a ciągłość instytucji prawnych – uwagi teoretyczne”. Zeszyty Prawnicze 16(2): 5–35.

Mańko, Rafał. 2017a. “Legal Transfers in Europe Today: Still ‘Modernisation Through Transfer’?” In Mutual Interaction Between Contemporary Systems and Branches of Law in European Countries. 139–155. Edited by Paulina Bieś-Srokosz, Jacek Srokosz, Ewelina Żelasko-Makowska. Częstochowa: Podobiński Publishing House.

Mańko, Rafał. 2017b. “Prawo użytkowania wieczystego jako pozostałość po epoce realnego socjalizmu – ujęcie socjologicznoprawne”. Zeszyty Prawnicze 17(1): 35–63.

Mańko, Rafał. 2017c. “Symbolic Violence in Technocratic Law and Attempts at Its Overcoming: Politicisation Through Humanization?” Studia Erasmiana Wratislaviensia 11: 31–64.

Mańko, Rafał. 2018a. “Towards a Typology of Dimensions of the Continuity and Discontinuity of Law: The Perspective of Polish Private Law after the 1989 Transformation”. Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics 6(2): 108–120.

Mańko, Rafał. 2018b. “Conference Report: 3rd International Workshop on Law and Ideology on the ‘Rule of Law and the Politics of Conflict’, Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia, 23–24 May 2016”. Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics 6(2): 184–186.

Mańko, Rafał. 2018c. “XII Konferencja Central and Eastern European Network of Jurisprudence (CEENJ), Ryga, Łotwa, 14–16 września 2017 r.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej 18(3): 97–101.

Mańko, Rafał. Martin Škop. Marketa Štěpáníková. 2018. “Carving Out Central Europe as a Space of Legal Culture: A Way Out of Peripherality?” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics 6(1): 4–28.

Mańko, Rafał. Wojciech Kauczor. Wojciech Zomerski. 2015. “Conference Report: 1st International Workshop on Law and Ideology (Wrocław, 29–30 May 2014)”. Wrocław Review of Law, Administration and Economics 3(2): 84–88.

Medushevsky, Andrei. 2018. “Konstitutsionnaya retraditsionalizatsiya v vostochnoy Yevrope i Rossii”. Sravnitel'noye Konstitutsionoye Obozreniye 122(1): 13–22.

Merryman, John Henry. 1969. The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang. 2015. “Prologue: The Westernisation of the East and the Easternisation of the West”. In Central European Judges Under the European Influence: The Transformative Power of the EU Revisited. 1–12. Edited by Michal Bobek. Oxford: Hart Publishing/Bloomsbury.

Nazmutdinov, Bulat. 2019. “Critical Dimensions of the ‘Legal Culture’ Approach: the Case of Classical Eurasianism and Eurasia’s Legal Union”. Folia Iuridica 89: 81–93.

Philippopoulos‐Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2013. “Spatial Justice in the Lawscape”. In Urban Interstices: The Aesthetics and Politics of the In-Between. 87–102. Edited by Andrea Brighenti. Surrey: Ashgate.

Pirie, Gordon H. 1983. “On Spatial Justice”. Environment and Planning 15: 465–473.

Rakoczy, Filip. 2015. “2nd International Workshop on Law And Ideology ‘Memories of Struggles, Struggles of Memories’, Sarajevo, 28–29 maja 2015”. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej 11: 157–160.

Renner, Karl. 1975. The Institutions of Private Law and their Social Functions. London: Kegan & Paul.

Rodak, Lidia. 2016. “Structural Violence and Its Gender Dimension in Polish Law”. In Law and Critique in Central Europe: Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present. 131–153. Edited by Rafał Mańko, Cosmin Cercel, Adam Sulikowski. Oxford: Counterpress.

Sitek, Bronisław. 2008. “Od antropocentryzmu prawniczego do ekonomizacji prawa”. In Człowiek pomiędzy prawem a ekonomią w procesie integracji europejskiej. 515–523. Edited by Gaetano Dammacco, Bronisław Sitek, Oksana Cabaj. Olsztyn–Bari: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.

Škop, Martin. 2016. “The Importance of Being a Linguist. Critical Legal Thought in Central Europe”. In Law and Critique in Central Europe: Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present. 32–43. Edited by Rafał Mańko, Cosmin Cercel, Adam Sulikowski. Oxford: Counterpress.

Sulikowski, Adam. 2007. Wstęp do prawoznawstwa. Krótki kurs. Wałbrzych: Wałbrzyska Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości.

Szymaniec, Piotr. 2018. “Discussion About the Legal Identity of Central and Eastern Europe. 3rd Annual CEENELS Conference ‘Legal Identities and Legal Traditions in CEE’”. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 85: 139–153.

Uzelac, Alan. 2010. “Survival of the Third Legal Tradition?” Supreme Court Law Review 49: 377–396.

Watson, Alan. 1993. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Athens–London: University of Georgia Press.

Ziembiński, Zygmunt. 1980. Problemy podstawowe prawoznawstwa. Warszawa: PWN.

Ziętek, Magdalena. 2012. “Europejskie prawo konsumenckie jako wyraz technokratycznej koncepcji prawa umów”. In Kierunki rozwoju europejskiego prawa prywatnego. 275–291. Edited by Monika Jagielska, Ewa Rott-Pietrzyk, Aneta Wiewiórowska-Domagalska. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.

Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2006. “The German Civil Code and the Development of Private Law in Germany”. Oxford University Comparative Law Forum 1, available at: https://ouclf.iuscomp.org/the-german-civil-code-and-the-development-of-private-law-in-germany [Accessed: 6 November 2019].

Zomerski, Wojciech. 2016. “Conference report: 1st International Conference of the Central European Network of Legal Scholars (CENELS) on 25 Years After the Transformation: Law and Legal Culture in Central and Eastern Europe. Between Continuity and Discontinuity’, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, 16–17 April 2015”. Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics 4(2): 103–108.

Zomerski, Wojciech. 2018. “Conference Report: 2nd Annual Conference of the Central and Eastern European Network of Legal Scholars (CEENELS): ‘An Uneasy Legacy: Remnants of Socialist Legal and Political Thinking in Central and Eastern Europe’, Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration, 7–8 January 2017”. Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics 7(2): 83–85.

Zweigert, Konrad. Hein Kötz. 1996. Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

First Page

63

Last Page

80

Language

eng

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.