•  
  •  
 

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica

Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2371-9232 Gołębiewska Maria

Abstract

In the Logical Investigations, Edmund Husserl defines that which is normative as the objectively regular with its rules of regularity, which can be recognised rationally – normativity concerns the being itself and the rational cognition of the being (logic as a normative discipline establishing the rules of scientific knowledge, as the science of science). Instead, Adolf Reinach in The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law defines the notion of norm as polysemantic and distinguishes the legal provisions (the prescriptive sentences), formulated within a given community, from the basic norms which are grounded in the objective (including moral) justness of the states of affairs. The obligation of the being and the obligation of acting exist in themselves, independently from cognition. In turn, “enactments and the propositions which express enactments” as a kind of normative sentences have the character of normalisation, but they require a person to pronounce them. The prescriptions realise and refer to what is objectively being and to the objectivity of what is being and obligatory. In my text, I present Reinach’s position on the relations between norms and provisions (as prescriptive propositions “which express enactments”) referring his theories to the Husserlian concept of normativity.

Keywords

description, prescription, law, norm, ideality, ideation

References

Ambroise, Bruno. 2005. “Le problème de l’ontologie des actes sociaux: Searle héritier de Reinach?” Les Études philosophiques 1(72): 55–71.

Amselek, Paul. 2014. Mettre le droit en valeurs (Rapport présenté au colloque “La valeur, les valeurs, le droit” organisé le 28 novembre 2014 par le Centre d’études et de recherches sur les contentieux de la Faculté de Droit de Toulon). 1–25. http://paul-amselek.com/textes.php [Accessed 14 February 2017].

Brandom, Robert B. 1998. Making It Explicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA–London: Harvard University Press.

Cantegreil, Julien. 2005. “D’une voie phénoménologique en théorie du droit. Remarques sur le réalisme d’Adolf Reinach”. Les Études philosophiques 1(72): 99–112.

Chérot, Jean-Yves. 2013. “Paul Amselek et la normativité en droit”. Revue de la Recherche Juridique – Droit prospectif (Cahiers de Méthodologie Juridique) 38(27): 1997–2009.

Conrad-Martius, Hedwig. 1959. “Die Transzendentale und die ontologische Phänomenologie”. In Edmund Husserl, 1859–1959. Recueil commémoratif publié à l’occasion du centenaire de la naissance du philosophe (Phänomenologica, 4). 175–184. Edited by Jacques Taminiaux, Herman L. Van Breda. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Derrida, Jacques. 2011. Voice and Phenomenon. Introduction to the Problem of the Sign in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Translated by Leonard Lawlor. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Gardies, Jean-Louis. 1972. Essai sur les fondements a priori de la rationalité morale et juridique. Paris: LGDJ.

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. 1972. Essai de critique phénoménologique du droit. Paris: Klincksieck.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Husserl, Edmund. 1983. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy – First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Fred Kersten. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logical Investigations. Vol I. Translated by John N. Findlay. London – New York: Routledge.

Ingarden, Roman. 1992. Einführung in die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls: Osloer Vorlesungen 1967. Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 4. Edited by Gregor Haefliger. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis – Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Laugier, Sandra. 2005. “Actes de langage et états de choses: Austin et Reinach”. Les Études philosophiques 1(72): 73–97.

Mayrhofer, Philipp. 2005. “Réalisme et fondation chez A. Reinach”. Les Études philosophiques 1(72): 3–18.

Mulligan, Kevin. Ed. 1987. Speech Act and Sachverhalt. Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

Reinach, Adolf. 1912–1913. “Die Überlegung: ihre ethische und rechtliche Bedeutung”. Part I. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 148: 181–196.

Reinach, Adolf. 1912–1913. “Die Überlegung: ihre ethische und rechtliche Bedeutung”. Part II. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 149: 30–58.

Reinach, Adolf. 1913. “Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechtes”. In Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 1(2): 685–847.

Reinach, Adolf. 1969. “Concerning Phenomenology”. Translated by Dallas A. Willard. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly (50)2: 194–221. www.dwillard.org/articles/individual/concerningphenomenology-trans.-of-adolf-reinachs-ueber-phaenomenologie [Accessed 5 January 2018].

Reinach, Adolf. 1983. “The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law”. Translated by John F. Crosby. Aletheia. An International Journal of Philosophy 3: 1–142.

Reinach, Adolf. 1989. “Über Phänomenologie”. In Sämtliche Werke: Textkritische Ausgabe in 2 Bänden. 531–550. Edited by Karl Schuhmann, Barry Smith. München: Philosophia Verlag.

Scheler, Max. 1973. Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. Translated by Manfred S. Frings, Roger L. Funk. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Simons, Peter. 1995. “Meaning and Language”. In The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. 106–137. Edited by Barry Smith, David W. Smith. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, Barry. 1990. “Towards a History of Speech Act Theory”. In Speech Acts, Meaning and Intentions. 29–61. Edited by Armin Burkhardt. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

First Page

41

Last Page

61

Language

eng

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.