•  
  •  
 
European Spatial Research and Policy

Abstract

The evaluation of the actors in regional development is only one component/level within the regional research. However, it is a level which increases its significance and has or could have the key role in the sphere of regional development and at the same time reflects the problems on other levels. It is in fact the proportionality and balance of the whole system that determines the resulting effects of activities and regulatory competence of actors. If there is an imbalance - even an asymmetry - in this system, advocacy of only certain interests becomes understandably imminent, as well as a reduction of interactions (not only) in the organisation of regional society.

Differentiation of actors derives primarily from the distribution of power and wealth in a society, and thus it has always played an exceptionally significant role. However, as a consequence of the hierarchical organisation of the society this differentiation was noticeably asymmetrical. The non-equivalence of partial subjects/actors of regional development has led to the understandable domination of ‘deterministic’ relations and the plurality of interests and then to the dominance of ‘competitive’ relations. Only gradually do interactions of a cooperative kind successively break through the growth of mutual interconnections, linkages and necessity of social elements and partial systems, and thus the increasing of organic nature of (geo)societal systems. This will be finally illustrated through the difference between ‘symmetric’ systems of actors in developed countries and the ‘asymmetric’ global system.

Keywords

regional development actors, balances versus asymmetric systems, social capital, developed countries, global system

Language

eng

References

AMIN, S. (1977), Imperialism and Unequal Development, Hassocks: Harvester.

BHASKAR, R. (1979), The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, Brighton: Harvester.

BLAŽEK, J. (2002), ‘Local Government Finances in the Czech Republic as a Framework for Local Development: 12 Years of Trial and Error Approach’, Acta Universitatis Carolinae - Geographica, 37 (2), pp. 157-173.

BLAŽEK, J. and UHLÍŘ, D. (2002), Teorie regionálního rozvoje (nástin, kritika, klasifikace), Prague: Karolinum, 212 p.

BLAŽEK, J. and UHLÍŘ, D. (2007), ‘Regional Innovation Policies in the Czech Republic and the Case of Prague: An Emerging Role of a Regional Level?’, European Planning Studies, 15 (7), pp. 871-888.

BLAŽEK, J. and MACEŠKOVÁ, M. (2009), ‘Regional Analysis of Public Capital Expenditure: To which Regions is Public Capital Expenditure Channelled - to "Rich" or to "Poor" Ones?’, Regional Studies (in print).

BRESCHI, S. and LISSONI, F. (2001), ‘Localized Knowledge Spillovers versus Innovative Milieu: Knowledge "Tacitness" Reconsidered’, Pápera in Regional Science, 80, pp. 255-273.

COOKE, P. (ed.), (1989), Localities: The Changing Face of Urban Britain, London: Unwin Hyman.

DOSTÁL, P. and HAMPL, M. (1993), ‘Territorial Organization of Society: Czechoslovak Developments’, [in:] BENNETT, R. J. (ed.), Local Government in the New Europe, London: Belhaven Press, pp. 259-277.

DOSTÁL, P. and HAMPL, M. (2000), Globalisation: Processes of Integration or Multipolarisation’, Acta Universitatis Carolinae - Geographica, 1, pp. 5-20.

EMMANUEL, A. (1972), Unequel Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade, New York: Monthly Review Press.

FRANK, A. G. (1978), Dependent Accumulation and Underdevolpment, London: Macmillan.

GIDDENS, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.

GORZELAK, G. (1998), Regional and Local Potential for Transformation in Poland, Warsaw: Euroreg.

HAMPL, M. (2000), Reality, Society and Geographical/Environmental Organization: Searching for an Integrated Order, Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Science.

HAMPL, M. (2003), ‘Diferenciace a zvraty regionálního vývoje Karlovarska: unikátní případ nebo obecný vzor?’, Geografie - Sborník České geografické společnosti, 108 (2), pp. 173-190.

HAMPL, M. (2005), Geografická organizace společnosti v České republice: transformační procesy a jejich obecný kontext, Prague: Přírodovědecká fakulta UK v Praze.

HAMPL, M. (2009), Globální systém: stav, současné tendence a možné perspektivy distribuce mocenského potenciálu (v tisku).

HAMPL, M., BLAŽEK, J. and ŽÍŽALOVÁ, P. (2008), ‘Faktory - mechanizmy - procesy v regionálním vývoji: aplikace koncepce kritického realizmu’, Ekonomický časopis (v tisku).

HODGSON, G. M. (1999), Structures and Institutions. Reflections on Institutionalism, Structuration Theory and Critical Realism (Draft of 3 June 1999), Hertford: University of Hertfordshire.

HUNTINGTON, S. (1997), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remarking of World Order, New York: Simon and Schuster.

ILLNER, M. (2003), ‘The Czech Republic 1990-2001. Successful Reform at the Municipal Level and a Difficult Birth of the Intermediary Givernment, [in:] BALDERSHEIM, H., ILLNER, M. and WOLLMANN, H. (eds), Local Democracy in Post-Communist Europe, Opladen: Leske-Budrich, pp. 61-90.

KOSTELECKÝ, T., PATOČKOVÁ, V. and VOBECKÁ, J. (2007), ‘Regions in the Czech Republic - Are There Connections between Economic Development, Social Cupital and Government Performance?’, Czech Sociological Review, 43 (5), pp. 911-943.

KUZNETS, S. (1955), ‘Economic Growth and Income Inequality’, The American Economic Review, 45, pp. 1-28.

MALMBERG, A. (1996), ‘Industrial Geography: Agglomeration and Local Milieu’, Progress in Human Geography, 20, pp. 89-109.

OHMAE, K. (1995), The End of the National State. The Rise of Regional Economies, New York: The Free Press.

PAVLÍNEK, P. (2008), A Successful Transformation? Restructuring of the Czech Automobile Industry, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

PERLÍN, R. (1996), ‘Problematika organizace státní správy a samosprávy’, [in:] HAMPL, M. (ed.), Geografická organizace společnosti a transformační procesy České Republice, Prague: Přírodovědecká fakulta UK, pp. 315-332.

SAYER, A. (1984), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, London: Routledge.

SMEJKAL, M. (2008), Aktéři, stimulační a regulační mechanizmy regionálního rozvoje - příklad Pardubického kraje, Disertační práce, Prague: Přírodovědecká fakulta UK.

STORPER, M. (1995), ‘The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later: The Region as a Nexus of Untraded Interdependencies’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 2, pp. 191-221.

VOZÁB, J. (1998), ‘Regional Development Agencies in the Czech Republic: A Future Solution to Current Problems’, [in:] HALKIER, H., DANSON, M. and DAMBORG, Ch. (eds), Regional Development Agencies in Europe, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 125-140.

WALLERSTEIN, I. (1979), The Capitalist World - Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

WALLERSTEIN, I. (1984), ‘Long Waves as Capitalist Process’, Review, 7, pp. 559-575.

First Page

75

Last Page

92

Language

eng

Share

COinS