•  
  •  
 
European Spatial Research and Policy

Language

eng

References

BEKSTA, A. and PETKEVICIUS, A. (2000), ‘Local Government in Lithuania’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

BÍRÓ, A-M. and KOVÁCS, P. (eds), (2001), Diversity in Action - Local Public Management of Multi-ethnic Communities in Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative.

BLÁZEK, J. (2001), ‘Regional Development and Regional Policy in the Czech Republic: An Outline of the EU Enlargement Impacts’, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 12, pp. 757-769.

COMAN, P., CRAI, E., RADULESCU, M. and STANCIULESCU, G. (2001), ‘Local Government in Romania’, [in:] KANDEVA, E. (ed.), Stabilization of Local Governments. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 2, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

Die Regionen der Tschechischen Republik stellen sich vor (2001), Praha: Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj a DaDa.

DRUMEVA, E. (2001), ‘Local Government in Bulgaria’, [in:] KANDEVA, E. (ed.), Stabilization of Local Governments. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 2, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

EMILEWICZ, J. and WOLEK, J. (2002), Reformers and Politicians, Białystok, Warszawa: SEAPELISPA.

EU COMMISSION (2000), Spatial Perspectives for the Enlargement of the European Union, Bruxelles, Luxembourg: Commission of the European Union.

GERRITSE, R. (2007), The Autonomy of Local Governments versus National Policy Objectives in the Czech Republic - Insights in the Use of Selected Quality Management Instruments in Local Governments, Praha, Groningen: MEPCO, University of Groningen.

HALÁSZ, I. (2000), ‘Az új regionális önkormányzatok alkotmányos helye és szerkezete az egyes kelet-közép-európai országokban’, Állam és Jogtudomány, 41, pp. 97-142.

HORVÁTH, M. T. (2000), ‘Directions and Differences of Local Changes’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

HORVÁTH, R. and VERESS, E. (2003), Regionális politika és területfejlesztés Romániában, Magyar Kisebbség, 1, pp. 30-32.

KANDEVA, E. (ed.), (2001), Stabilization of Local Governments. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 2, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

KEMKERS, R. H. C. (2005a), ‘Közigazgatás és igazgatásszervezés az EU15-ben - Centralizmus, regionalizmus, lokalizmus és glokalizmus’ [Public administration and administrative division in the EU15 - Centralism, regionalism, localism and ‘glocalism’], [in:] BUGYA, T. and WILHELM, Z., Tanulmányok Tóth Józsefnek, pp. 109-131. Pécs: Geographical Institute, University of Pécs.

KEMKERS, R. H. C. (2005b), ‘Where Exactly is the European Union? Borders, Regions and Statistical Divisions of the New EU25’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 12 (2), pp. 131-144.

KIERES, L. (1997), Development of Regionalisation in Europe, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

KOWALCZYK, A. (2000), ‘Local Government in Poland’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

LACINA, K. and VAJDOVA, Z. (2000), ‘Local Government in the Czech Republic’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

MÄELTSEMEES, S. (2000), ‘Local Government in Estonia’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

MEZEI, I. and HARDI, T. (2003), ‘A szlovák közigazgatás és területfejlesztés asszimmetriái’, Tér és Társadalom, 4, pp. 127-156.

NEMEC, J., BERCIK, P. and KUKLIS, P. (2000), ‘Local Government in Slovakia’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.) Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

PÁLNÉ KOVÁCS, I. (2005), ‘Hungary of the Regions: Utopia or Ultimatum?’, [in:] BARTA, GY. et al. (eds), Hungarian Spaces and Places: Patterns of Transition, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.

SETNIKAR-CANKAR, S., VLAJ, S. and KLUN, M. (2000), ‘Local Government in Slovenia’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

SZIGETI, E. (2002), Község, város, jogállás - A magyar településhálózat közigazgatási térszerkezetének néhány kérdése, Budapest: Magyar Közigazgatási Intézet.

TÜSKE, T. (2003), ‘A szlovén regionális politika törvényi háttere’, [in:] MEZEI, C. (ed.), Pécsi Tudományegyetem Közgazdaságtudománi Kara Regionális Politika és Gazdaságtan Doktori iskola Évkönyve 2002, Pécs: Faculty of Economics, University of Pecs.

VANAGS, E. and VILKA, I. (2000), ‘Local Government in Latvia’, [in:] HORVÁTH, M. T. (ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Inititiative, Open Society Institute.

First Page

117

Last Page

142

Language

eng

Share

COinS