European Spatial Research and Policy


The paper brings to the foreground modes and strategies of organising purposeful action that may be conductive to local and regional actors’ successful coping in the more and more competitive environment. The paper is pragmatist by its approach in a sense that it emphasises preconditions and possibilities for making ideas work. However, to do this is a difficult task. In the maze of multifaceted information flows and revolutionary technologies for reaching them enterprises and public actors need to find and construct better structured information that really helps them to operate. The paper introduces two sets of case activities that build on open innovation and living lab approaches in their attempts to make the boundaries between organisations and their environment more permeable. Its findings support the structuralist idea that spatial attributes matter more than as a mere venue, platform, or even container of social action. The venues studied in the paper are unique: one of the oldest still remaining factory buildings in the innermost core of the city of Tampere and a re-used loghouse in a peri-urban landscape outside the city. They both serve now as true exploratory spaces with no functional or institutional lock-ins stemming from them to bond their present-day users.


industrial renewal, spaces of innovation, new work




AHLAVA, A. and EDELMA N, H. (2008), Urban Design Management. A Guide to Good Practice (translated from Urban Design Management. Opas käytäntöön, 2007), London: Taylor and Francis.

ANDERSEN, K. V., HANSEN, H. K., ISAKSEN, A. and RAUNIO, M. (2010), ‘Nordic City Regions in the Creative Class Debate – Putting the Creative Class Thesis to a T est’, Industry and Innovation, 17 (2), pp. 215–240.

ARNKIL, R., JÄRVENSIVU, A., KOSKI, P. and PIIRAINEN, T. (2010), Exploring Quadruple Helix. Outlining User-oriented Innovation Models, Tampere: University of Tampere, Institute for Social Research, Work Research Centre.

BURT, R. (1995), Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition, Second printing, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.

CHESBROUGH, H. (2003), Open Innovation: New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, MA : Harvard Business School Press.

CLARK, T. N. (2007), ‘Making Culture into Magic: How Can It Bring Tourists and Residents?’, International Review of Public Administration, 12 (1), pp. 13–25.

CLARK, P. (2009), European Cities and Towns 400-2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

CONZEN, M. R. G. (2004), Thinking about Urban Form. Papers on Urban Morphology, 1932–1998, ed. by M. P. CONZEN, Bern: Peter Lang A.G.

DREAM CITY (2011), http://thedreamcity.com/

FEENBERG, A. (2010), Between Reason and Experience. Essays in Technology and Modernity, Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press.

FLANAGAN, O. (2009), The Really Hard Problem. Meaning in a Material World, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

FORSBERG, G., GRIMSRUD, G. M., JAKOBSEN, L., JANSDOTTER, M. and STUBBERUD, K. V. (2006), Gränsfall. Platsens betydelse för omställning och utveckling i en gränsregion. Border case. Place and the Restructuring and Development of a Border Region, Stockolm: Nordregio.

FRIEDMAN, T. (2007), Litteä maailma. 2000-luvun lyhyt historia (translated from The World is Flat. A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century [updated and expanded], 2006), Helsinki: Otava.

GALLIVAN, M. and SRITE, M. (2005), ‘Information Technology and Culture: Identifying Fragmentary and Holistic Perspectives on Culture’, Information and Organization, 15, pp. 295–338.

HÄNNINENA., and LEINO, J. (2011), ‘Mistä jatkajia yrittäjien työlle?’ (Who to continue entrepreneurs’ work?), Suomen Asiakastieto, Majakka, 1, pp. 30–39.

HEALEY, P. and THOMAS, H. (1991), ‘Knowledge, Skills and Their Validation: Knowing Why, As Well As Knowing What and How’, [in:] THOMAS, H. and HEALEY, P. (eds.), Dilemmas of Planning Practice, Aldershot: Avebury Technical, pp. 193–199.

HUB Tampere (2011), http://hubtampere.wordpress.com/in-english/

HUIZINGH, E. K. R. E. (2011), ‘Open Innovation: State of the Art and Future Perspectives’, Technovation, 31, pp. 2–9.

HYNYNEN, A. and KOLEHMAINEN, J. (2011), ‘Keskikokoinen metapolis? Näköaloja osaamisvetoiseen kehittämiseen Seinäjoella’ (Mid-size metapolis? Perspectives to Knowledgedriven Development in the City of Seinäjoki), University of Tampere Sente Working Papers, 32.

JACQUES, R. (1996), Manufacturing the Employee. Management Knowledge from the 19th to 21st Centuries, London: Sage.

JANIS, I. L. (1982), Groupthink. Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, Second Edition, New York: Houghton Mifflin.

KARPPI, I. (2012), ‘Towards Associative Meaningfulness. A Community Development Close-up. Forthcoming’, [in:] TODISCO, E., KULTALAHTI, J. and KULTALAHTI, O. (eds.), Dynamics of Globalisation: Methodological, Economic and Social Aspects, Rome: la Sapienza University.

KARPPI, I. and PIHLAJAMAA, P. (2010), ‘Venues of Industrial Renewal’, [in:] RANTANEN, K. (ed.), Living Industrial Past, Museum Centre Vapriikki, Tampere Museums Publications 110, Finnish Labour Museum Werstas,1, Tampere, pp. 90–109.

KARPPI, I. and TAKALA, A. (2007), ‘North-European Bio-locations: Different Paths to Success’, Structural Change in Europe [Cities and Regions Facing up to Change], 5, pp. 74–79.

KARPPI, I. and TAKALA, A. (2008), ‘Overwhelmed by Globalization? Revival of a Small Town Central Business District and the Sense of Locality’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 15, pp. 99–54.

KOSTIAINEN, J. (2002), Urban Economic Development Policy in the Network Society, Tampere: Tekniikan akateemisten liitto TEK.

KULTALAHTI, O. (2001), ‘From Heavy Industries to a High-Tech Centre: Mobility of Educated Labour in Tampere’, Espace, Populations, Societes, 3, pp. 297–309.

LANIER, J. (2011), You Are Not a Gadget. A Manifesto [with updated material], London: Penguin.

LUUKKO, T. (2010), ‘Täydellinen tila synnyttää uutta’ (Perfect space regenerates), Rajapinta, 3. http:/rajapinta.tut.fi/text/artikkelit/2010/3/Taydellinen_tila_synnittaa_uutta

NOOTEBOOM, B. (2001), Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

OLDS, K. and THRIFT, N. (2005), ‘Cultures on the Brink: Reengineering the Soul of Capitalism – on a G lobal Scale’, [in:] ONG, A. and COLLIER, S. (eds.), Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 270–290.

PAAKKUNAINEN, K. (2007), Alkaisinko yrittäjäksi? Tutkimus nuorten yrittäjyyspoliittisista kirjoituksista ja asenteista (Becoming an entrepreneur? Youth’s essays and attitudes on entrepreneurial policy), Helsinki: Yksityisyrittäjäin säätiö, Kerhokeskus - koulutyön tuki ry & Nuorisotutkimusverkosto.

PINKER, S. (2006), ‘The Biology of Fiction’, [in:] WELLS, R. H. and McFADDEN, J. (eds.), Human Nature. Fact and Fiction, London: Continuum, pp. 27–39.

POLANYI, M. and PROSCH, H. (1977), Meaning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

RASILA, T. (2004), Venture-to-Capital. A New Framework for Growth Venturing and Professional Ownership, Tampere, Tampere University of Technology.

REICH, R. B. (1992), The Work of Nations. Preparing Ourselves for the 21st Century Capitalism, New York: Vintage.

REICH, R. B. (2001), The Future of Success, London: William Heinemann.

SACK, R. D. (1997), Homo Geographicus. A Framework for Action, Awareness and Moral Concern, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

SENNETT, R. (2002), Työn uusi järjestys. Miten uusi kapitalismia kuluttaa ihmisen luonnetta, (translated from The Corrosion of Character, 1999), Tampere: Vastapaino.

SENNETT, R. (2009), The Craftsman, London: Penguin.

SMITH, S. J. (1993), ‘Social Landscapes: Continuity and Change’, [in:] JOHNSTON, R. J. (ed.), The Challenge for Geography. A Changing World: A Changing Discipline, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 54–75.

SUUNTAAMO (2011), http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/livinglab/suuntaamo-tampere-central-region-living-lab

SYLVERS, E. (2011), ‘Fiat Turns Its Back on Italian Employer Group’, International Herald Tribune, 4th October.

VIRILIO, P. (2007), The Original Accident (translated from L’accident original, 2005), Cambridge: Polity.

VIRTANEN, M. (1987), Tehtaasta studioon (From factory to studio), Helsinki: Hanki ja Jää.

YLÄ-ANTTILA, K. (2010), Verkosto kaupunkirakenteen analyysin ja suunnittelun välineenä (Network as a tool for analysing and planning urban form), Tampere: Tampere University of Technology.

First Page


Last Page