•  
  •  
 
European Spatial Research and Policy

Abstract

Large scale timber construction has been on the upswing for some time in many European countries. Besides the building cluster, also regions and cities have taken advantage of the ongoing timber boom in their economic and spatial development. In this article the focus is on the South Ostrobothnia region and the city of Seinäjoki in Western Finland, where the potential of the business is quite weakly exploited regardless of favourable preconditions. By studying the key actors of the innovation network we are able to better understand the premises of the local development platform that should aim at boosting timber construction.

Keywords

urban development, regional development, timber construction, innovation network, development platform

Language

eng

References

BURT, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.

CAMAGNI, R. (1991), Innovation Networks. Spatial Perspectives. London, Belhaven Press.

CHESBROUGH, H. W. (2003a), The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review. 44:3, pp. 35–41.

CHESBROUGH, H. W. (2003b), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

COHEN, W. and LEVINTHAL, L. (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, pp. 128–152.

COOKE, P. (2004), Introduction: Regional Innovation Systems – an Evolutionary Approach, [in:] COOKE, P., HEIDENREICH, M. and BRACZYK, H.-J. (eds.), Regional Innovation Systems, 2nd Edition. London, Routledge.

COOKE, P., BOEKHOLT, P. and TÖDTLING, F. (2000), The Governance of Innovation in Europe. Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness. Science, Technology and the International Political Economy. London, Pinter.

ESALA, L., HIETALA, J. and HUOVARI, J. (2012), Puurakentamisen yhteiskunnalliset vaikutukset (Economic Impacts of Wood Construction). PTT raportteja 239. Helsinki, Pellervon taloustutkimus PTT.

GRANOVETTER, M. S. (1973), The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 78:6, pp. 1360–1380.

HARMAAKORPI, V., TURA, T. and MELKAS, H. (2011), Regional Innovation Platforms, [in:] COOKE, P., ASHEIM, B., BOSCHMA, R., MARTIN, R., SCHWARTZ, D. and TÖDTLING, F. (eds.), Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth. Cheltenham, UK, Edwar Elgar.

HEIFETZ, R. A. (2003), Leadership Without Easy Answers. 13th edition. Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

HEIKKINEN, P., KAUFMANN, H., WINTER, S. and LARSEN, K. E., (eds.) (2009), TES Energy Facade – prefabricated timber based building system for improving the energy efficiency of the building envelope. Woodwisdom Net. [14.10.2015] http://www.tesenergyfacade.com/index.php?id=4_downloads

HYNYNEN, A., PANU, A-M. and TAANILA, T., (eds.) (2015), Puu-Hubi. Perinteestä uusiin innovaatioihin. Tampere University of Technology, School of Architecture / Seinäjoki Urban Laboratory.

KAUTONEN, M. (2008), Yksi alue, monta innovaatioympäristöä, [in:] TEOKSESSA SOTARAUTA, M. and MUSTIKKAMÄKI, N. (eds.), Innovaatioympäristön monet kasvot. Tampere University Press.

KOLEHMAINEN, J. (2004), Instituutioista yksilöihin: Paikallisen innovaatioympäristön kolme tasoa, [in:] TEOKSESSA SOTARAUTA, M. and KOSONEN, K-J. (eds.), Yksilö, kulttuuri, innovaatioympäristö. Avauksia aluekehityksen näkymättömään dynamiikkaan. Tampere University Press.

LECHNER, C. and DOWLING, M. (2003). Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 15, pp. 1–26.

LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (2001), Innovation Policy in the Globalizing Economy, [in:] ARCHIBUGI, D. and LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (eds.), The Globalizing Learning Economy. Oxford University Press, pp. 272–291.

MÄNNISTÖ, T., TÖRMÄ, H. and JYLHÄ, P. (2012), Metsän arvoketjujen aluetaloudelliset vaikutukset Etelä- ja Keski-Pohjanmaalla. Puurakentaminen ja yhdistetty lämmön ja sähkön tuotanto. Raportteja 94. Helsingin yliopisto, Ruralia –instituutti.

PETERSEN, A.K. and SOLBERG, B. (2005), Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics 7, pp. 249–259.

SIMMONS, A. (2001), The Story Factor: Inspiration, influence and persuasion through the art of storytelling. New York, Basic Books.

SOIKKELI, A., KOISO-KANTTILA, J. and SORRI, L. (2014), Korjaa ja korota. Kerrostalojen korjaamisen ja lisäkerrosten rakentamisen ratkaisuja. Julkaisu A 62. Oulun yliopisto, Arkkitehtuurin tiedekunta.

SOTARAUTA, M., KOSONEN, K-J. and VILJAMAA, K. (2007). Aluekehittäminen generatiivisena johtajuutena. 2000-luvun aluekehittäjän työnkuvaa ja kompetensseja etsimässä. Sente-julkaisuja 23/2007. Tampereen yliopisto, Alueellisen kehittämisen tutkimusyksikkö.

SOTARAUTA, M. and SRINIVAS, S. (2006), Co-evolutionary Policy Processes: Understanding Innovative Economies and Future Resilience. Futures 38/3, pp. 312–336.

SPAARGAREN, G. and MOL, A. P. J. (1992), Sociology, Environment and Modernity: Ecological Modernization as a Theory of Social Change. Society and Natural Resources 5, pp. 323–344.

The Guardian (2015), http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/mar/01/vienna-plans-worlds-tallest-wooden-skyscraper [18th Dec 2015].

VIRKKALA, S. (2008), Maaseutualueet ja pienet keskukset Innovaatioympäristöinä, [in:] TEOKSESSA SOTARAUTA, M. and MUSTIKKAMÄKI, N. (eds.), Innovaatioympäristön monet kasvot. Tampere University Press.

ZAHRA, A. Z. and GEORGE, G. (2002), Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization and Extension. Academy of Management Review 27/2, pp. 185–203.

First Page

127

Last Page

139

Language

eng

Share

COinS