•  
  •  
 
European Spatial Research and Policy

Abstract

Recent studies on socio-spatial polarization and post-socialist spaces increasingly propose the use of postcolonial theory. Following this proposal, the paper attempts to make the decolonial approach fruitful for studying the crucial role that discourses play for rural peripheralisation processes in post-socialist Estonia. It shows that the Estonian discourses on peripheries manifest in a struggle between neoliberalism and interventionism as two competing regional development models that promote either self- or state responsibility for dealing with peripheralisation. Despite their differences, both models build on the same notion of modernity, as the colonial history associated with socialist modernity renders alternative models obsolete.

Keywords

rural area, peripheralisation, spatial discourses, postcolonialism, Estonia

Language

eng

References

ANNIST, A. (2011), Otsides kogukonda sotsialismijärgses keskuskülas. Arenguantropoloogiline uurimus, Tallinn: Tallinn University Press.

ANNUS, E. (2012), ‘The Problem of Soviet Colonialism in the Baltics’, Journal of Baltic Studies, 43 (1), pp. 21–45.

ANSPAL, S. and RÕÕM, T. (2010), ‘Gender Pay Gap in Estonia. Empirical Analysis’, https://www.sm.ee/sites/default/files/content-editors/Ministeerium_kontaktid/Valja-anded/gender_pay_gap_estonia_analysis.pdf (10.03.2017).

BALČYTIENĖ, A. and HARRO-LOIT, H. (2009), ‘Between Reality and Illusion: Re-Examining the Diversity of Media and Online Professional Journalism in the Baltic States’, Journal of Baltic Studies, 40 (4), pp. 517–530.

BOURDIEU, P. (1991), Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

BRISTOW, G. (2005), ‘Everyone’s a Winner. Problematising the Discourse of Regional Competitiveness’, Journal of Economic Geography, 5 (3), pp. 285–304.

BÜRK, T., KÜHN, M. and SOMMER, H. (2012), ‘Stigmatisation of Cities. The Vulnerability of Local Identities’, Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 70 (4), pp. 337–347.

Eurotopics (2015), ‘Estonia’s Female Journalists are Afraid of Opinions’, http://archiv.eurotopics.net/en/home/presseschau/archiv/article/ARTICLE168608-Estonias-fema-le-journalists-are-afraid-of-opinions (26.10.2016).

FOUCAULT, M. (1999), Botschaften der Macht. Der Foucault-Reader, Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.

GYURIS, F. (2014), The Political Discourse of Spatial Disparities. Geographical Inequalities between Science and Propaganda, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

HALL, S. (1992), ‘The West and the Rest. Discourse and power’, [in:] HALL, S. and GIEBEN, B. (eds.), Formations of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 275–332.

Institut für Medien- und Kommunikationspolitik (IfM) (2015), ‘Länderporträt Estland’, http://www.mediadb.eu/europa/estland.html (24.10.2016).

JÄGER, S. (1999), Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung, Duisburg: DISS.

JÕESALU, K. and KÕRESAAR, E. (2013, ‘Continuity or Discontinuity. On the Dynamics of Remembering ‘Mature Socialism’ in Estonian Post-Soviet Remembrance Culture’, Journal of Baltic Studies, 44 (2), pp. 177–203.

KASKLA, E. (2003), ‘The national woman. Constructing gender roles in Estonia’, Journal of Baltic Studies, 34 (3), pp. 298–312.

KAY, R., SHUBIN, S. and THELEN, T. (2012), ‘Rural realities in the post-socialist space’, Journal of Rural Studies, 28 (2), pp. 55–62.

KOOBAK, R. and MARLING, R. (2014), ‘The decolonial challenge. Framing post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe within transnational feminist studies’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21 (4), pp. 330–343.

KÜHN, M. (2015), ‘Peripheralization. Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities’, European Planning Studies, 23 (2), pp. 367–378.

LACLAU, E. (1996), Emancipation(s), London: Verso.

LAURISTIN, M. and VIHALEMM, P. (2009), ‘The Political Agenda during Different Periods of Estonian Transformation. External and Internal Factors’, Journal of Baltic Studies, 40 (1), pp. 1–28.

LEETMAA, K., KRISZAN, A., NUGA, M. and BURDACK, J. (2013), ‘Strategies to Cope with Shrinkage in the Lower End of the Urban Hierarchy in Estonia and Central Germany’, European Planning Studies, 23 (1), pp. 147–165.

MASSEY, D. (2004), ‘Geographies of responsibility’, Geografiska Annaler B: Human Geography, 86 (1), pp. 5–18.

MEYER, F. and MIGGELBRINK, J. (2013), ‘The Subject and the Periphery. about Discourses, Loopings and Ascriptions’, [in:] FISCHER-TAHIR, A. and NAUMANN, M. (eds.), Peripheralization. The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 207–223.

MOORE, D.C. (2006), ‘Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? Towards a Global Postcolonial Critique’, [in:] KELERTAS, V. (ed.), Baltic Postcolonialism, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 11–44.

NUGIN, R. (2014), ‘I think that they should go. Let them see something. The context of rural youth’s out-migration in post-socialist Estonia’, Journal of Rural Studies, 34, pp. 51–64.

PECK, J. (2010), Construction of Neoliberal Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

PIKE, A., RODRIGUEZ-POSE, A. and TOMANEY, J. (2007), ‘What kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom?’, Regional Studies, 41 (9), pp. 1253–1269.

PLÜSCHKE-ALTOF, B. (2016), ‘Rural as Periphery per se? Unravelling the Discursive Node’, Sociální studia ‒ Social Studies, 13 (2), pp. 11–28.

PoSCoPP. (2015), ‘Understanding new Geographies of Central and Eastern Europe’, [in:] LANG, T., HENN, S., EHRLICH, K. and SBIGNEV, W., Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization. Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 1–24.

RAČEVSKIS, K. (2002), ‘Toward a Postcolonial Perspective on the Baltic States’, Journal of Baltic Studies, 33 (1), pp. 37–56.

SAID, E. (1995), Orientalism. Western conceptions of the Orient, London: Penguin Books.

SCHWAB-TRAPP, M. (2006), ‘Diskurs als soziologisches Konzept. Bausteine einer soziologisch orientierten Diskursanalyse’, [in:] KELLER, R., HIRSELAND, A., SCHNEIDER, W. and VIEHÖVER, W., Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftlicher Diskursanalyse, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 263–285..

SPIVAK, G.C. (1988), Can the Subaltern Speak? Postkolonialität und subalterne Artikulation. Wien: Turia + Kant.

STENNING, A. and HÖRSCHELMANN, K. (2008), ‘History, Geography and Difference in the Post-socialist World. Or, Do We Still Need Post-Socialism?’, Antipode, 40 (2), pp. 312–335.

SUCHLAND, J. (2011), ‘Is Postsocialism Transnational?’, Signs, 36 (4), pp. 837–862.

TLOSTANOVA, M. (2012), ‘Postsocialist ≠ postcolonial? On Post-Soviet imaginary and Global Coloniality’, Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 48 (2), pp. 130–142.

WACQUANT, L., SLATER, T. and PEREIRA, V.B. (2014), ‘Territorial stigmatization in action’, Environment and Planning A, 46 (6), pp. 1270–1280.

First Page

59

Last Page

75

Language

eng

Share

COinS