European Spatial Research and Policy


Poverty rate is influenced by numerous factors. The determining ones are economic growth and the distribution of its effects. This article is therefore focused on the analysis of these effects and their relationship, as well as their influence on poverty at a regional level (NUTS 3, ‘kraj’). For the analysis of interactions between growth and distribution in correlation to poverty reduction, the Bourguignon model (the Poverty-Growth-Inequality triangle) and the growth incidence curve (GIC) were used. It was found that economic growth positively influences income inequalities as well as decreases the share of population under the poverty threshold in all regions. However, the development differs across regions. Based on the development and tendencies of the gross domestic product (GDP), income distribution and poverty it is obvious that economically strong regions (or their populations) dealt better with poverty during the crisis period.


growth, inequalities, income distribution, poverty, Bourguignon model




ADAMS, R. H. (2004), ‘Economic Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Estimating the Growth Elasticity of Poverty’, World Development, 32 (12), pp. 1989–2014.

BOURGUIGNON, F. (2004), ‘The poverty-growth-inequality triangle’, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 28102.

CHEMLI, L., SMIDA, M. (2013), ‘Interaction between Poverty, Growth, and Inequality during the Crisis: A Panel Data Study’, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5 (5), pp. 120–130.

DOLLAR, D., KRAAY, A. (2002), ‘Growth is Good for the Poor’, Journal of Economic Growth, 7 (3), pp. 195–225.

Eurostat (2016), http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (21.11.2016).

FERREIRA, F. (2012), ‘Distributions in Motion: Economic Growth, Inequality, and Poverty Dynamics’, [in:] JEFFERSON, P. N., The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Poverty, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 427–462.

FUNKE, M., STRULIK, H. (1999), ‘Regional growth in West Germany: convergence or divergence?’, Economic Modelling, 16 (4), pp. 489–502.

IRADIAN, G. (2005), ‘Inequality, Poverty, and Growth: Cross-Country Evidence’, International Monetary Fund Working Paper, WP/05/28, Washington, DC.

KHAN, M. A., KHAN, M. Z., ZAMAN, K., HASSAN, U., UMAR, S. (2013), ‘Global estimates of Growth-Inequality-Poverty (GIP) Triangle: Evidence from the World Bank’s Classification Countries’, Qual Quant, 48 (5), pp. 2631–2646.

KURZ-EURO.SK. (2016), ‘Archív denných kurzových lístkov’, http://kurz-euro.zones.sk/kurzy/ (9.12.2016).

KUZNETS, S. (1955), ‘Economic growth and income inequality’, American Economic Review, 45 (1), pp. 1‒28.

LEITNER, S., STEHRER, R. (2014), ‘Drivers of Inequality and Poverty in the CEE and other EU Member States. A Shapley Value Decomposition Analysis’, Research Report, 398, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.

MADAJOVÁ, M., MICHÁLEK, A., PODOLÁK, P. (2014), ‘Úroveň regionálnych disparít na Slovensku a jej zmena v období rokov 2001–2011’, In Regionálne a priestorové disparity na Slovensku, ich vývoj v ostatnom desaťročí, súčasný stav a konzekvencie, Bratislava: Geografický ústav SAV, pp. 127–152.

MICHÁLEK, A., VESELOVSKÁ, Z. (2015), ‘Poverty risk in districts of the Slovak Republic’, Social Indicators Research, 124 (1), pp. 67–83.

RAVALLION, M. (2001), ‘Growth, Inequality, and Poverty: Looking Beyond Averages’, World Development, 29 (11), pp. 1803–1815.

RAVALLION, M. (2005), ‘Inequality is Bad for the Poor‘, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3677, Washington D.C: The World Bank.

RAVALLION, M., CHEN, S. (2001), ‘Measuring Pro-poor growth’, Policy Research Working Paper, 2666, Washington D.C: The World Bank.

ŠTATISTICKÝ ÚRAD – ŠÚ SR (2016a), DATA cube, http://datacube.statistics.sk/TM1WebSK/TM1WebLogin.aspx (21.11.2016).

ŠTATISTICKÝ ÚRAD – ŠÚ SR (2016b), ‘Interné materiály Štatistického úradu SR’, Sekcia sociálnych štatistík a demografie, Odbor štatistiky životnej úrovne obyvateľstva, Bratislava: Štatistický úrad SR.

TRIDICO, P. (2010), ‘Growth, Inequality and Poverty in Emerging and Transition Economies’, Review of Transition Studies, 16 (4), pp. 979–1001.

First Page


Last Page