European Spatial Research and Policy

Author ORCID Identifier Mariotti Ilaria


Since the mid-2000s, the rising phenomenon of coworking spaces (CSs) has provided a flexible and mainly affordable solution for freelancers, entrepreneurs, small firms and start-ups, which may had experienced the issues of isolation when working from home, to work in a shared workplace, interact, socialize and share knowledge. This article explores the phenomenon of CSs within the theoretical framework of proximity measures a là Boschma (2005) – cognitive, organisational, social and institutional – that underpin the aspects of innovation, interaction and knowledge exchange. Though some studies on CSs have indirectly studied the different aspects of proximity, only a few of them focused on the importance of proximity measures at the workspace. With the aim to fill the gap in the literature, an empirical study was applied to Italy with 549 active CSs in 2018. The data was collected through an on-line questionnaire, addressed to a sample of 326 coworkers, focusing mainly on the set of questions devoted to understanding whether coworkers have exploited the proximity typologies in their CSs, have experienced increases in their revenues and well-being. The results are critically discussed, and some insights on policy implications are proposed.


coworking space, coworker, proximity measures, Italy




AKHAVAN, M. and MARIOTTI, I. (2018), ‘The Effects of Coworking Spaces on Local Communities in the ItalianContext’, Territorio 87, pp. 85–92.

ALLEN, T.J., TOMLIN, B. and HAUPTMAN, O. (2008), ‘Combining organisational and physical location to manage knowledge dissemination’, International Journal of Technology Management, 44 (1/2).

AVDIKOS, V. and KALOGERESIS, A. (2017), ‘Socio-economic profile and working conditions of freelancers in co-working spaces and work collectives: evidence from the design sector in Greece’, Area, 49 (1), pp. 35–42.

AYDALOT, Ph. (1986), (ed.), Miliex innovateurs en Europe, Paris: GREMI.

BALLAND, P.A. (2012), ‘Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry’, Regional Studies, 46 (6), pp. 741–756.

BALLAND, P.-A., BOSCHMA, R. and FRENKEN, K. (2015), ‘Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics’, Regional Studies, 49 (6), pp. 907–920.

BECATTINI, G. (1990), ‘The Marshallian industrial district as socio-economic notion’, [in:] PYKE, F., BECATTINI, G., SENGENBERGER, W. (eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy, Geneve: International institute for Labour Studies.

BILANDZIC, M. and FOTH, M. (2013), ‘Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning’, Library Hi Tech, 31 (2), pp. 254–273.

BLAGOEV, B., COSTAS, J. and KÄRREMAN, D. (2019), ‘«We are all herd animals»: Community and organizationality in coworking spaces’, Organization, 135050841882100.

BOSCHMA, R. (2005), ‘Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment’, Regional Studies, 39 (1), pp. 61–74.

BOUNCKEN, R.B. and REUSCHL, A.J. (2018), ‘Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship’, Review of Managerial Science, 12 (1), pp. 317–334.

CAPDEVILA, I. (2013), Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters. Available at SSRN: or (2016/05/25)

CAPELLO, R. (2007), Regional Economics, Routledge, London and New York.

COHEN, D. and PRUSAK, L. (2001), In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA.

COOKE, P. (2002), Knowledge Economies: clusters, learning and cooperative advantage, London: Routledge.

DAVIES, A. and TOLLERVEY, K. (2013), The Style of Coworking: Contemporary Shared Workspaces, Munich: Prestel Verlag.

Di MARINO, M. and LAPINTIE, K. (2017), ‘Emerging Workplaces in Post-Functionalist Cities’, Journal of Urban Technology, 24 (3), pp. 5–25.

DOLFSMA, W. and SOETE, L. (eds.) (2006), Understanding the Dynamics of a Knowledge Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

ETZIONI, A. (1994), The Spirit of Community: The reinvention of American society, New York: Simon & Schuster.

FONNER, K.L. and STACHE L.C. (2012), ‘All in a day’s work, at home: teleworkers’ management of micro role transitions and the work–home boundary’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 27 (3), pp. 242–257.

GANDINI, A. (2015), ‘The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review’, Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations, 15 (1), pp. 193–205.

GARRETT, L.E., SPREITZER, G.M. and BACEVICE, P.A. (2017), ‘Co-constructing a Sense of Community at Work: The Emergence of Community in Coworking Spaces’, Organization Studies, 38 (6), pp. 821–842.

GASPAR, J. and GLAESER, E.L. (1998), ‘Information technology and the future of cities’, Journal of Urban Economics, 43 (1), pp. 136–156.

GERTLER, M.S. (2008), ‘Buzz without being there? Communities of practice in context’, [in:] AMIN, A. and ROBERTS, J., (eds.) Community, Economic Creativity, and Organization, pp. 203–226, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

GOLD, M. and MUSTAFA, M. (2013), ‘«Work always wins»: client colonisation, time management and the anxieties of connected freelancers’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 28 (3), pp. 197–211.

HARDEMAN, S., FRENKEN, K., NOMALER, Ö. and TERWAL, A. (2012), ‘A proximity approach to territorial science systems’, EUROLIO Conference on ‘Geography of Innovation’, 24–26 January 2012, Saint-Etienne, France.

HOWELL, T. and BINGHAM, C. (2019), Coworking spaces: working alone, together, Kenan Institute Working Paper. Retrieved from

JOHNS, T. and GRATTON, L. (2013), ‘The Third Wave of Virtual Work – Harvard Business Review’, Harvard Business Review, 5 (I), pp. 1–16.

JOROFF, M.L. (2002), ‘Workplace mind shifts’, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 4 (3), pp. 266–274.

KIM, J. and KAPLAN, R. (2004), ‘Physical and Psychological Factors in Sense of Community: New Urbanist Kentlands and Nearby Orchard Village’, Environment and Behaviour, 36 (3), pp. 313–340.

KWIATKOWSKI, A. and BUCZYNSKI, B. (2011), Coworking: How freelancers escape the coffee shop office, Fort Collins, Colorado, US: Cohere Coworking.

MARIOTTI, I. and DI MATTEO, D. (2020), ‘Coworking in emergenza Covid-19: quali effetti per le aree periferiche?’, EyesReg, 10 (2):

MARIOTTI, I., PACCHI, C. and Di VITA, S. (2017), ‘Coworking Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects’, Journal of Urban Technology, 24 (3), pp. 47–66.

MARSHALL, A. (1925), Principles of Economics, 8th edition, London: Macmillan.

MERKEL, J. (2015), ‘Coworking in the city’, Ephemera | theory & politics in organisation, 15 (1), pp. 121–139.

MORISET, B. (2014), ‘Building new places of the creative economy: The rise of coworking spaces’, 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference 2014 Utrecht University, Utrecht, 23–25 January 2014.

MORISET, B. and MALECKI, E.J. (2009), ‘Organization versus space: The paradoxical geographies of the digital economy’, Geography Compass, 3 (1), pp. 256–274.

MORRISON, A. (2018), ‘A typology of places in the knowledge economy: Towards the fourth place’, International symposium on new metropolitan perspectives, pp. 444–451.

NEEF, D. (ed.) (1998), The Knowledge Economy, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

OLDENBURG, R. (1989), The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community, New York: Paragon House.

PARRINO, L. (2015), ‘Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange’, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13 (3), pp. 261–271.

RAFFAELE, C. and CONNELL, J. (2016), ‘Telecommuting and Co-Working Communities: What Are the Implications for Individual and Organizational Flexibility?’, [in:] SUSHIL, CONNELL, J. and BURGESS, J. (eds.), Flexible Work Organizations, pp. 21–35.

ROBELSKI, S., KELLER, H., HARTH, V. and MACHE, S. (2019), ‘Coworking Spaces: The Better Home Office? A Psychosocial and Health-Related Perspective on an Emerging Work Environment’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (13), 2379.

ROVAI, A.P. (2002), ‘Building Sense of Community at a Distance’, International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 3 (1), pp. 1–16.

SALVADOR, E., MARIOTTI, I. and CONICELLA, F. (2013), ‘Science park or innovation cluster? Similarities and differences in physical and virtual firms’ agglomeration phenomena’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 19 (6), pp. 656–674.

SPINUZZI, C. (2012), ‘Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26 (4), pp. 399–441.

SPINUZZI, C., BODROŽIĆ, Z., SCARATTI, G. and IVALDI, S. (2019), ‘«Coworking Is About Community»: But What Is «Community» in Coworking?’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33 (2), pp. 112–140.

TORRE, A. (2010), ‘Jalons pour une analyse dynamique des proximités’, Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine (3), pp. 409–438.

TORRE, A. and GILLY, J.-P. (2000), ‘On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics’, Regional Studies, 34 (2), pp. 169–180.

WEBER, A. (1909/1929), Theory of the Location of Industries, trans. by FRIEDRICH, C.J. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

First Page


Last Page