•  
  •  
 

International Studies: Interdisciplinary Cultural and Political Journal

Abstract

China’s role as an emerging aid provider and the concept of a social plan in Africa has led to polarised responses in the West. Several say that this “productivist” strategy is much less determined by the concepts of citizenship, legal, social rights, and much more regarding building functions. The purpose of this study is to examine whether the welfare and social policy ideas that characterize Chinese aid in Africa are influencing traditional donors and becoming global. The article utilised a qualitative study that has two main components. First, a comprehensive content analysis of over 50 key Sino-African, Chinese and Western policy documents from 2000 (since cooperation between Beijing and African countries first became institutionalised). Second, there were semi-structured interviews with Chinese, African and Western stakeholders in Addis Ababa, (Ethiopia), who was directly involved in the relationship between China and Africa and related development issues. The result of documentation and interview analyses show that there are currently significant differences between Chinese and Western approaches. China has made much stronger and more explicit links between development aid and economic activity than most Western donors. The aid is usually implemented through specific projects rather than broader programs or policies.

Keywords

Africa, China, OECD-DAC, South-South cooperation

References

Alexia Delclaux Gaytán de Ayala. Just give money to the poor. The Development Revolution from the Global South. “Comillas Journal of International Relations”, no. (2), (1 February 2015), Issue 2.

Ahmad, M. Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies, and Politics. “Development in Practice”, no. 23(1) (2013), pp. 151–152.

Anon. China in Africa: why the West is worried. “New African”, no. (471) (2008), p. 12.

Anon. China issues white paper on foreign aid. “Xinhua Economic News”, (April 21, 2011).

Anon. Constructing National Interests. In Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press, 1999, p. 97.

Anon. From ‘safety nets’ back to ‘universal social provision’: is the global tide turning? [in:] The global social policy reader. Bristol, UK; Chicago, IL, USA: Policy Press, 2009, p. 371.

Anon. Global Social Policy & Governance. “Reference and Research Book News”, vol. 22(3), no. 22(3) (Aug, 2007).

Anon. Rogue to vogue? Aid. “The Economist”, no. 425(9062) (2017), p. 38.

Asche, H. China Returns to Africa: A Rising Power and a Continent Embrace. “The Journal of African History”, no. 50(3) (2009), pp. 461–462.

Darrow, M. The Millennium Development Goals: Milestones or Millstones? Human Rights Priorities for the Post-2015 Development Agenda”. “Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal”, vol. 15 (2012), p. 55.

Dreher, A., Fuchs, A. and Nunnenkamp, P. New Donors. “International Interactions”, no. 39(3) (2013), pp. 402–415.

Duncan, G. After Neo-Liberalism, What Could Be Worse? “New Zealand Sociology”, no. 29(1) (2014), pp. 15–39.

Du Plessis, A. The Forum on China–Africa Cooperation, Ideas and Aid: National Interest(s) or Strategic Partnership? “Insight on Africa”, no. 6(2) (2014), pp. 113–130.

Economy EC. The game changer. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 89(6) (2010), pp. 142–52.

Emery, T. Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Productivist Models of Social Policy, eds. Mason M.S. Kim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. ISBN 978‐1‐137‐47184‐0; £60 (hbk). “Social Policy & Administration”, no. 52(3) (2018), pp. 831–832.

Foli, R. “Understanding Global Social Policy”, no. 45(4) (2016), pp. 765–766.

Golley, J. The Dragon’s Gift: The Real Story of China in Africa. “Economic Record”, no. 87(278) (2011), pp. 501–502.

Goodman, R., White, G. and Kwŏn, H.-J. The East Asian welfare model: welfare Orientalism and the state. London: Routledge, 1998.

Gumede, V. Social policy for inclusive development in Africa. “Third World Quarterly”, no. 39(1) (2018), pp. 122–139.

Hopf, T. The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. “International Security”, no. 23(1) (1998), pp. 171–200.

Jean-Michel, S. and Ray, O. The End of ODA: Death and Rebirth of a Global Public Policy. “IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc” (2010).

Kjollesdal, Kristian and Welle-Strand, Anne. Foreign aid strategies: China taking over? (Report). “Asian Social Science”, no. 6(10) (2010), pp. 3–13.

Knight, B. China as a Developmental State. “World Economy”, no. 37(10) (2014), pp. 1335–1347.

Lacayo, C. Comparative Analysis about the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Debate about the Social Protection Policy and System – The Case of the Social Protection Net Program from Nicaragua (RPS) and a Proposal about a System of Unique Register of Poverty Family Beneficiaries, 2016.

Lafargue, F. China in Africa: A Limited Conquest. “China Perspectives”, no. (1) (2009), pp. 80–86.

Mardell, J. Foreign Aid with Chinese Characteristics. “The Diplomat” (Aug 7, 2018).

Midgley, J. Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. “Journal of Social Policy”, no. 34 (2005), pp. 311–312.

Mkandawire, T. Social policy in a development context. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 2001.

Mooij, J. Reclaiming Social Policy: Globalization, Social Exclusion and New Poverty Reduction Strategies by Arjan de Haan. “Development and Change”, no. 40(2) (2009), pp. 391–393.

OECD. DAC Chair Calls on Donors to Deliver on their Gleneagles Commitments, 2006. Web.12 September 2018, http://www.oecd.org/general/dacchaircallsondonorstodeliverontheirgleneaglescommitments.htm

OECD. Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Social Protection, 2009. Web. 12 September 2018, https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/iesf/document/promoting-pro-poor-growth-social-protection-oecd-2009

Pempel, T.J. Global Social Policy: International Organizations and the Future of Welfare (Book Review). “The Journal of Politics”, no. 62(1) (2000), pp. 310–312.

Polat, N. European integration as colonial discourse. “Review of International Studies”, no. 37(3) (2011), pp. 1255–1272.

Reilly, J. A Norm-Taker or a Norm-Maker? Chinese aid in Southeast Asia. “Journal of Contemporary China”, no. 21(73) (2012), pp. 71–91.

Rodrik, D. Growth versus poverty reduction: a hollow debate. ”Finance and development“ (trykt utg.) (2007), no. 37(4), pp. 8–9.

Saavedra, M. The New Sinosphere: China in Africa. “The China Quarterly”, no. 190 (2007), pp. 478–480.

Samy, Y. China’s Aid Policies in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges. “The Round Table”, no. 99(406) (2010), pp. 75–90.

Schemeil, Y. et al. Bringing International Organization In: Global Institutions as Adaptive Hybrids. “Organization Studies”, no. 34(2) (2013), pp. 219–252.

Urbina-Ferretjans, M. and Surender, R. Social Policy in the Context of New Global Actors: How Far is China’s Developmental Model in Africa Impacting Traditional Donors? “Global Social Policy”, no. 13(3) (2013), pp. 261–279.

The World Health Report. Health Systems Financing: the Path to Universal Coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.

Yeh, H.-J. Social Issues and Policies in Asia: Family, Ageing and Work, eds. Raymond K.H. Chan, Lih-Rong Wang and Jens O. Zinn. “International Journal of Care and Caring”, no. 2(2) (2018), pp. 297–299.

First Page

199

Last Page

215

Language

eng

Share

COinS