This article discusses a 2018 theatrical production of Hamlet with Romanian teenage arts students, directed by one of the article’s authors, actress and academic Dana Trifan Enache. As an artist, she believes that the art of theatre spectacle depends pre-eminently on the actors’ enactment, and hones her students’ acting skills and technique accordingly. The other voice in the article comes from an academic in a cognate discipline within the broad field of arts and humanities. As a feminist and medievalist, the latter has investigated the political underside of representations of the body in religious drama, amongst others. The analytic duo reflects as much the authors’ different professional formation and academic interests as their asymmetrical positioning vis-à-vis the show as respectively the play’s director and one of its spectators. Their shared occupational investment, teaching to form and hone highly specialized professional skills, and shared object of professional interest (broadly conceived), text interpretation, account nevertheless for the possibility of fruitful interdisciplinary reflection on the 2018 Hamlet. This in-depth analysis of the circumstances of the performance and technical solutions it sought challenges stereotyped dismissals of a students’ Hamlet as superannuated, flimsy or gratuitously provocative. Furthermore, a gender-aware examination of the adaptation’s original handling of characters and scenes indicates unexpected cross-cultural and diachronic commonalities between the dramatic world of the 2018 Romanian production of Hamlet and socio-cultural developments emergent in pre-Shakespearean England.


„Hamlet” (Romanian theatrical production, 2018), student actors, role doubling, collective character, gender identity, cross-cultural echoes


Albanese, Denise. Extramural Shakespeare. Reproducing Shakespeare. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (1973). 2nd ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997.

Brook, Peter. The Empty Space (1968). New York: Touchstone, 1996.

The Chester Mystery Cycle. Ed. R. M. Lumiansky and David Mills. Early English Text Society s.s. 3. London, New York, Toronto: Oxford UP, 1974.

Ciobanu, Estella. Representations of the Body in Middle English Biblical Drama. The New Middle Ages. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Cixous, Hélène. “Castration or Decapitation?” Signs 7.1 (1981): 41-55. Originally published as “Le Sexe ou la tete?” in Les Cahiers du GRIF 13 (1976): 5-15.

Cohn, Ruby. Modern Shakespeare Offshoots. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1976.

Csapo, Eric. Actors and Icons of the Ancient Theater. Malden, Oxford, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

Cuddon, J. A. A Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. 5th ed. Rev. M. A. R. Habib. Malden, Oxford, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.

Fischlin, Daniel. Introduction. Outerspeares: Shakespeare, Intermedia, and the Limits of Adaptation. Ed. Daniel Fischlin. Toronto, Buffalo, London: U of Toronto P, 2014. 3-50.

Gianakaris, C. J. “Stoppard’s Adaptations of Shakespeare: Dogg’s Hamlet, Cahoot’s Macbeth.” Comparative Drama 18.3 (1984): 222-240.

Hamlet – Colegiul Național de Arte “Regina Maria” Constanţa. Theatrical production directed by Dana Trifan Enache, 2018. Video of the performance, 4 Sept. 2018. Faculty of Arts, Ovidius University of Constanţa. YouTube premiere 5 May 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e72m904suLw&t=2049s

Huang, Alexa. “Global Shakespeares as Methodology.” Shakespeare 9.3 (2013): 273-290.

Huang, Alexa and Elizabeth Rivlin. Introduction: Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation. Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation. Ed. Alexa Huang and Elizabeth Rivlin. Reproducing Shakespeare. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 1-20.

Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. London: Routledge, 2006.

Desmet, Christy, Sujata Iyengar and Miriam Jacobson, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Global Appropriation. Routledge Literature Handbooks. London, New York: Routledge, 2020.

Joubin, Alexa Alice. “Global Shakespeare.” The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare. Ed. Michael Dobson and Stanley Wells. 2nd ed. Rev. Will Sharpe and Erin Sullivan. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2015. 144-145.

Joubin, Alexa Alice and Aneta Mancewicz. Introduction. Local and Global Myths in Shakespearean Performance. Ed. Aneta Mancewicz and Alexa Alice Joubin. Reproducing Shakespeare. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 1-21.

Kidnie, Margaret Jane. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation. London, New York: Routledge, 2009.

Massai, Sonia. Introduction: Defining Local Shakespeares. World-Wide Shakespeares: Local Appropriations in Film and Performance. Ed. Sonia Massai. London, New York: Routledge, 2005. 1-11.

Phillips, Susan E. Transforming Talk: The Problem with Gossip in Late Medieval England. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 2007.

Rajewsky, Irina O. “Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality.” Intermédialités 6 (2005): 43-64.

Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge, 2016.

Schaberg, Jane. The Resurrection of Mary Magdalene: Legends, Apocrypha, and the Christian Testament. New York, London: Continuum, 2004 (2002).

Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Ed. Philip Edwards. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003.

Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prinţ al Danemarcei (Hamlet, Prince of Denmark). Text adaptation by Iulian Enache. Theatrical production directed by Dana Trifan Enache. Director’s copy. 2018.

Spielmann, Yvonne. Intermedialität. Das System Peter Greenaway. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1998.

Stoppard, Tom. Dogg’s Hamlet, Cahoot’s Macbeth. In Plays One: The Real Inspector Hound; After Magritte; Dirty Linen; New-Found-Land; Dogg’s Hamlet, Cahoot’s Macbeth. Introduced by the author. Contemporary Classics. London: Faber and Faber, 1996.

Vareschi, Carlo. “Fear and Loathing in Prague: Tom Stoppard’s Cahoot’s Macbeth.” Comparative Drama 52.1–2 (2018): 123-139.

Zeitlin, Froma I. “Playing the Other: Theater, Theatricality, and the Feminine in Greek Drama.” Representations 11 (1985): 63-94.

First Page


Last Page