•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This article investigates nasal assimilation in Classical Nahuatl. The distribution of nasal consonants is shown to be the result of coda neutralization. It is argued that generalizations made for root and word level are disproportionate and cannot be explained through the means of rule-based phonology. It is shown that the process responsible for nasal distribution can only be accounted for by introducing derivational levels in Optimality Theory.

Keywords

Classical Nahuatl, derivational optimality theory (DOT), coda neutralization, nasal assimilation

References

Andrews, J. R. 2003. Introduction to Classical Nahuatl. Revised Edition. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

Bermudez-Otero, R. 2003. The acquisition of phonological opacity. In J. Spenader, A. Eriksson and O. Dahl (eds.), Variation within Optimality Theory: Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on `Variation within Optimality Theory´, 25-36. Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.

Beckman, Jill N. 1997. Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14. 1-46.

Bermudez-Otero, R. forthcoming. Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Booij, G. 2011. Morpheme Structure Constraints. In M. Van Oostendorp (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 2049-2069. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Canger, U. 1980. Ochpantzintli and Classical Nahuatl Syllable Structure. Estudios de Cultura Nahuatl 14. 361-373.

Campbell, R. J. and F. Karttunen. 1989. Foundation Course in Classical Nahuatl. Volume 2: Vocabulary and Key. Missoula: University of Montana.

Carochi, H. 2001. Grammar of the Mexican Language: With an Explanation of Its Adverbs. [Translated by J. Lockhart]. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1645)

Casali, Roderick. 1997. Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: Which vowel goes? Language 73: 493-533.

Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

Clements, G. N. 1985. The Geometry of Phonological Features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 223-252.

Goldsmith, J. A. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Hammond, R. M. 2001. The Sounds of Spanish: Analysis and Application. Sommerville: Cascadilla Press.

Halle, Morris. 1992. Phonological features. In William Bright (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, vol. 3, 207–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ito, J. 1986. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. New York: Garland Press.

Jakobson, R. 1965. Quest for the Essence of Language. Diogenes 13. 21-37.

Jun, J. 1995. Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: an optimality theoretic approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

Jun, J. 2004. Place assimilation. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner and Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 58–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kahn, D. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Ph.D. diss., Dept. of Foreign Literatures and Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Karttunen, F. 1992. An Analytical Dictionary of Nahuatl. University of Oklahoma: Norman and London.

Kiparsky, P. 1985. Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85-138.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. LP and OT. Handout. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Linguistic Institute.

Kiparsky, P. 2000. Opacity and Cyclicity. The Linguistic Review. 17. 351-376.

Lockhart, J. 2001. Nahuatl as Written: Lessons in Older Written Nahuatl With Copious Examples and Texts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Lombardi, L. 1997. Why Place and Voice are different: constraint-specific repairs in Optimality Theory. Ms, University of Maryland, College Park.

McCarthy, J. J. and A. Prince. 1994. “The Emergence of the Unmarked: Optimality in Prosodic Morphology”. Papers from the Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 24. 333–379.

McCarthy, J. J. and A. Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. N. Beckman, L. W. Dickey, and S. Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, 249–384. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.

McCarthy, J. J. 2008. The Gradual Path to Cluster Simplification. Phonology 25. 271-319.

Mohanan, K. P. 1993. Fields of attraction in phonology. In: J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The last phonological rule : reflections on constraints and derivations, 61–116. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ohala, J. J. 1986. Consumer’s guide to evidence in phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 3–26.

Ohala, J. J. 1990. The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. In J. Kingston and M. E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech, 258–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Padgett, J. 1995. Partial class behavior and nasal place assimilation. In K. Suzuki and D. Elzinga (eds.), Proceedings of the 1995 Southwestern Workshop on Optimality Theory (SWOT), 145-183. Tucson: Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona.

Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., and University of Colorado, Boulder.

Rubach, J. 1997. Extrasyllabic consonants in Polish: Derivational Optimality Theory. In Iggy Roca (ed.), Derivations and constraints in phonology, 551-581. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rubach, J. 2000. Glide and Glottal Stop Insertion in Slavic Languages: A DOT Analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 271-317.

Sagey, E. C. 1986. The Representation of Features and Relations in Non-Linear Phonology. Ph.D. diss., Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Salcedo, C. S. 2010. The Phonological System of Spanish. Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas 5. 195-209.

Schane S. A. 1984. The Fundamentals of Particle Phonology. Phonology 1. 129-155.

Selkirk, E. 1982. The syllable In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.), The structure of phonological representations II, 337-383. Dordrecht: Foris.

Steriade, D. 2001. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: a perceptual account. In: E. Hume and K. Johnson (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology, 219-250. San Diego: Academic Press.

Webb, C. 1982. A constraint on progressive consonantal assimilation. Linguistics 20. 309-321.

Wilson, C. 2001. Consonant Cluster Neutralisation and Targeted Constraints. Phonology 18. 174-197.

First Page

263

Last Page

295

Language

eng

Share

COinS