Research in Language


This paper has a dual purpose: it both seeks to introduce the other works in this issue by illustrating how they are related to the field of argumentation as a whole, and to make clear the tremendous range of research currently being carried out by argumentation theorists which is concerned with the interaction and inter-reliance of language and argument. After a brief introduction to the development of the field of argumentation, as many as eight language-based approaches to the study of argument are identified, taking as their perspective: rhetoric, argument structure, argument as act, discourse analysis, corpus methods, emotive argument, and narrative argument. The conclusion makes it clear that these branches of study are all themselves interconnected and that it is the fusion of methodologies and theory from linguistics and the philosophical study of argument which lends this area of research its dynamism.


corpus linguistics, argumentation, informal logic, discourse, rhetoric, fallacy


Aberdein, Andrew. 2006. ‘Raising the Tone: Definition, Bullshit, and the Definition of Bullshit.’ In George Reisch and Gary Hardcastle (eds.), Bullshit and Philosophy, 151-169. Chicago: Open Court.

Amossy, Ruth. 2009. Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments. Informal Logic 29 (3). 252-267.

Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blair, J. Anthony and Ralph H. Johnson. 2000. Informal Logic: An Overview. Informal Logic 20 (2). 93-107.

Katarzyna Budzynska, Araszkiewicz, Michał, Budzyńska-Daca, Agnieszka, Hinton, Martin, Lawrence, John, Modgil, Sanjay, Thimm, Matthias, Visser, Jacky, Żurek, Tomasz, Koszowy, Marcin, Atkinson, Katie, Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila, Kacprzak, Magdalena, Łupkowski, Paweł, Skowron, Barłomiej, Urbański, Mariusz and Maria Załęska. 2018. Warsaw Argumentation Week (Waw 2018) Organised by the Polish School of Argumentation and Our Colleagues from Germany and the UK, 6th-16th September 2018. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 55 (1). 231-239.

Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hamblin, Charles. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.

Hample, Dale and Amanda Irions. 2015. Arguing to Display Identity. Argumentation 29 (4) 389-416. DOI 10.1007/s10503-015-9351-9

Hinton, Martin. 2016. ‘Identity as Argumentation: Argumentation as Identity.’ In Kamila Ciepiela, (ed.) Identity in Communicative Contexts, 175-186. Łódż Studies in Language Vol.48. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Gilbert, Michael. 2004. Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic. Informal Logic 24 (3). 245-264.

Goodwin, Jean, and Viviana Cortes. 2010. Theorists’ and Practitioners’ Spatial Metaphors for Argumentation: A Corpus-based Approach. Verbum 23 (1). 163-78.

Goodwin, Jean and Beth Innocenti. 2016. ‘The Pragmatic Force of Making Reasons Apparent.’ In Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewiński (eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015, Vol. II, 449-462. London: College Publications.

Macagno, Fabrizio. 2014. Manipulating Emotions. Value-Based Reasoning and Emotive Language. Argumentation and Advocacy 51. 103-122.

Macagno, Fabrizio and Douglas Walton. 2014. What We Hide in Words: Emotive Words and Persuasive Definitions. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 1997-2013.

Nelson, Leonard. 2016. A Theory of Philosophical Fallacy. Cham: Springer.

Olmos, Paula (ed.). 2017. Narration as Argument. Cham: Springer.

Oswald, Steve, Herman, Thierry and Jérôme Jacquin (eds.). 2018. Argumentation and Language – Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations. Cham: Springer.

Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. La Nouvelle Rhétorique: Traité de l‘Argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver, as The New Rhetoric, Notre Dame, London: University of Notre Dame Press.

Saussure, Louis de. 2018. ‘The Straw Man Fallacy as a Prestige-Gaining Device.’ In Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman, and Jérôme Jacquin (eds.), Argumentation and Language – Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations, 171-190. Cham: Springer.

Stevens, Katharina and Michael Baumtrog (eds.). 2018. Special Issue: Reason and Rhetoric in the Time of Alternative Facts. Informal Logic 38. 1.

Stevenson, Charles. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Tindale, Christopher. 2007. Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tindale, Christopher. 2017. ‘Narratives and the Concept of Argument.’ In Paula Olmos (ed.), Narration as Argument, 11-30. Cham: Springer.

Visser, Jacky, Koszowy, Marcin, Konat, Barbara, Budzyńska, Katarzyna and Chris Reed. 2018. ‘Straw Man as Misuse of Rephrase.’ In Steve Oswald and Didier Maillat (eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, Vol. 2., 941-962. London: College Publications.

Walton, Douglas and Thomas F. Gordon. 2018. How Computational Tools Can Help Rhetoric and Informal Logic with Argument Invention. Argumentation. 1-27.

Walton, Douglas, Macagno, Fabrizio and Chris Reed. 2008. Argument Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wu, Peng. 2019. Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Argumentation 33 (1). 1-22.

Zhang, Chuanrui and Cihau Xu. 2018. Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study. Argumentation 32 (4). 501-517.

First Page


Last Page