•  
  •  
 

Title

The Trisagion Riots (512) as an Example of Interaction between Politics and Liturgy

Abstract

This article explores the political and cultural context of the riots provoked by changes in the Trisagion (512). Along with the advancing integration of the Byzantine Empire with Christianity, the state’s interest in theological problems increased; these problems were also reflected in the liturgy. Worship was used as a tool of imperial policy. This mutual interaction between politics and liturgy can be observed particularly clearly in the history of the Trisagion. This hymn, in its primitive form appearing in the book of Isaiah (as the familiar Sanctus Sanctus Sanctus), had two interpretations from the first centuries. According to the first one, the hymn referred to God, or – with the development of theology – to the whole Holy Trinity. According to the second interpretation (probably originating from Antioch), it referred to Christ. Already in the 4th century, the Trisagion entered the liturgy. In the middle of the 5th century, we encounter a new version of the Trisagion (known as SanctusDeus, Sanctus Fortis), which was an elaboration of the above-mentioned hymn. It also found use in the liturgy and originally had a Trinitarian sense. The Monophysites, in order to give the hymn an anti-Chalcedonian sense, added to it the expression who was crucified for us; this makes the hymn unambiguously Christological, but it may also suggest theopaschism (all of the Trinity was crucified). In Antioch, where the Trisagion first appeared in that form (and where the hymn had always been interpreted as referring to Christ), this addition did not provoke protests from the Chalcedonians. However, when the Monophysite emperor Anastasius decided to introduce this version to the liturgy in Constantinople, the inhabitants of the capital – accustomed to understanding the Trisagion in the Trinitarian sense – interpreted the change as an offence against the Trinity. This caused the outbreak of the Trisagion riots (512). Not long afterwards, restoring the anthem in the version without the addition became one of the postulates of military commander Vitalian’s rebellion against Anastasius. Thus, in the case under analysis, we see theology and liturgy blending with current politics; one and the same hymn could be understood as heretical in one city and as completely orthodox in another.

Keywords

Trisagion, liturgy, Antioch, Constantinople, Anastasius I, Monophysitism, theopaschism, state-Church relations, Ecclesiastical politics

References

Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, ed. E. Schwartz, vol. II, Concilium Chalcedonense (451), Berlin ²1962.

Athanasius Theologus, In illud: Omnia mihi tradita sunt, ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1857, col. 209–220 [= Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, 25].

The Chronicle of John, bishop of Nikiu, ed. R. Charles, London 1916.

Clemens Romanus, Èpitre aux Corinthiens, ed. A. Jaubert, Paris 1971 [= Sources chrétiennes, 167].

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus, trans. M. Whitby, Liverpool 2000.

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius with Scholia, ed. J. Bidez, L. Parmentier, London 1898.

Eusebius, Über des leben des Kaisers Konstantin, ed. F. Winkelmann, Berlin 1975 [= Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten [drei] Jahrhunderte, 6].

Flavius Iustinianus, Contra monophysitas, [in:] Drei dogmatische Schriften lustinians, ed. M. Amelotti, R. Albertella, Milano ²1973, p. 6–78.

Gregorius Nazanensius, In theophania (orat. 38), ed. J.-P. Migne, Paris 1858, col. 311–334 [= Patrologiae cursus completus, Series graeca, 36].

James of Edessa, The Hymns of Severus and Others, 136 a 365, ed. E.W. Brooks, Paris 1911 [= Patrologia orientalis, 7], p. 595–802.

Jean Chrysostome, Homélies sur Ozias, Paris 1981 [= Sources chrétiennes, 277].

Joannes Damascenus, Epistula de hymno trisagio, [in:] Die Schriften des Johannes Damaskos, ed. B. Kotter, Berlin 1981.

Joannes Damascenus, Expositio Fidei, [in:] Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos, ed. B. Kotter, vol. II, Berlin–New York 1973.

Jobius Monachus, De Verbo incarnato commentarius, [in:] Photius, Bibliothèque, cod. 222, vol. III, ed. R. Henry, Paris 2003.

John Damascene, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, trans. F.H. Chase, Washington, DC 1958, p. 165–406.

Nestorius, Bazaar of Heracleides, trans. O. Driver, L. Hodgson, Oxford 1925.

Origenes vier Bucher von den Prinzipien, ed. H. Gorgemanns, H. Karpp, Darmstadt 1976.

Les homilae cathedrales de Sévère d’Antioche, ed. M. Brière, Paris 1961 [= Patrologia orientalis, 29].

Theodores Anagnostes, Kirchengeschichte, ed. G.C. Hansen, Berlin 1971 [= Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten [drei] Jahrhunderte, 54].

Theophanis Confessori Chronographia, ed. C. de Boor, Leipzig 1883.

Abramowski L., Untersuchungen zum “Liber Heraclidis” des Nestorius, Louvain 1963 [= Corpus scriptorum christianorum orientalium, 224, Subs. 22].

Alvisatos H.S., Die Kirchliche Gesetzgebung des Kaisers Justinian I, Aalen 1973.

Bralewski S., Sobór w Chalcedonie w polityce wewnętrznej cesarza Marcjana, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Historica” 44, 1992, p. 53–74.

Cameron Av., Procopius and the sixth century, London 1985.

Charanis P., Church and State in the Later Roman Empire. The Religious Policy of Anastatsius the First, 491–518, Thessaloniki 1974.

Croke B., The Early Byzantine Earthquakes and Their Liturgical Commemoration, “Byzantion. Revue internationale des études byzantines” 41, 1981, p. 122–147.

Dagron G., La Chiesa e la cristianitá bizantine tra invasioni e iconoclasmo (VII secolo – inizi dell’ VIII), [in:] Storia del Cristianesimo, vol. IV, Vescovi, monaci e imperatori (610–1054), ed. G. Dagron, Roma 1999, p. 28–76.

De Decker D., Dupuis-Massay G., L’épiscopat de l’empereur Constantin, “Byzantion. Revue internationale des études byzantines” 50, 1980, p. 118–157.

Dijkstra J., Greatrex G., Patriarchs and Politics in Constantinople in the Reign of Anastasius (with a Reedition of “O.Mon.Epiph.” 59), “Millennium. Jahrbuch zu Kultur und Geschichte des erstenJahrtausends n.Chr. / Yearbook on the Culture and History of the First Millennium C.E.” 6, 2009,p. 223–264.

Duchesne L., Histoire de l’Eglise, vol. III, Paris 1911.

Dugmore C.W., The Influence of the Synagogue upon the Divine Office, Oxford 1944.

Dzielska M., Hypatia of Alexandria, Cambridge 1996.

Elliott T.G., The Christianity of Constantine the Great, Scranton, PA 1996.

Fraisse-Coué Ch., Da Efeso a Calcedonia: “la pace illusoria”(433–451), [in:] Storia del Cristianesimo, vol. III, Le chiese d’Oriente e d’Occidente (432–610), ed. L. Pietri, Roma 2000, p. 29–92.

Frend W.H.C., The Rise of Monophysite Movement. Chapters in the History of the Church in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries, Cambridge 1972.

Gerhards A., Le phenomene du Sanctus adresse au Christ. Son origine, sa signification et sa persistance dans les Anaphores de l’eglise d’Orient, [in:] Le Christ dans la liturgie, ed. A.M. Triacca,A. Pistoia, Rome 1981, p. 65–83.

Ginter K., Spór o ‘Trisagion’, “Res Historica” 14, 2002, p. 221–231.

Greatrex G., The Fall of Macedonius Reconsidered, “Studia Patristica” 44, 2010, p. 125–132.

Gregory T.E., Vox Populi. Violence and Popular Involvment in the Religious Controversies of the Fifth Century AD, Columbus, Ohio 1979, p. 163–201.

Grillmeier A., Gesu il Cristo nella fede della Chiesa, Roma 1982–2001.

Haarer F.K., Anastasius I. Politics and Empire in the Late Roman World, Cambridge 2006.

Hass Ch., Alexandria in Late Antiquity, Baltimore–London 1997.

Janeras S., Le Trisagion: une formule breve en liturgie comparée, [in:] Acts of International Congress. Comparative Liturgy fifty Years after Anton Baumstark (1872–1948), ed. R. Taft, G. Winkler, Roma 2001 [= Orientalia Christiana Analecta, 265], p. 495–562.

Janeras S., Les Byzantins et le Trisagion christologique, [in:] Miscellanea Liturgica in onore di sua Eminenza il cardinale Giacomo Lercaro, Roma 1967, vol. II, p. 469–499.

Karim A., The Meaning of the Trisagion in East and West, “Musicological Studies” 105, 2014, p. 23–38.

King A.A., The Rites of Eastern Christendom, vol. I, Piscataway, NJ 2007.

Lebon J., Le Monophysisme sévérien, Louvain 1909.

Liebeschuetz J.H.W.G., Decline and Fall of the Roman City, Oxford–New York 2001.

Maraval P., La ricezione di Calcedonia nell’impero d’Oriente, [in:] Storia del Cristianesimo, vol. III, Le chiese d’Oriente e d’Occidente (432–610), ed. L. Pietri, Roma 2000, p. 119–153.

Meier M., Anastasios I. Die Enstehung des Byzantinischen Reiches, Stuttgart 2010.

Meyendorff J., Imperial Unity and Christian Divisions, Crestwood–New York 1989.

Moeller Ch., Le chalcedonisme et neo-chalcedonisme en Orient de 451 a la fin du VI siecle, [in:] Das Konzil von Chalkedon, ed. A. Grillmeier, R. Bacht, vol. 1, Würzburg 1951, p. 637–721.

Morgan R., History of the Coptic Orthodox People and the Church of Egypt, Victoria 2016.

Neunheuser B., Storia della liturgia attraverso le epoche culturali, Roma 1983 [= Bibliotheca Ephemerides liturgicae. Subsidia, 11].

Pietri Ch., La conversione: propaganda e realta, [in:] Storia del Cristianesimo, vol. II, La nascita di una cristianita (250–432), ed. Ch. Pietri, L. Pietri, Roma 2000, p. 187–223.

Rapp C., Imperial ideology in the making. Eusebius of Caesarea on Constantine as “Bishop”, “The Journal of Theological Studies” 49, 1998, p. 685–695.

Taft R., The Interpolation of Sanctus into the Anaphora, 1, “Orientalia Christiana Periodica” 57, 1991, p. 281–308; 2, “Orientalia Christiana Periodica” 58, 1992, p. 83–121.

Wybrew H., The Orthodox liturgy. The development of the eucharistic liturgy in the Byzantine rite, Crestwood, NY 1990.

First Page

41

Last Page

57

Language

eng

Share

COinS