•  
  •  
 

Title

Berichus and the Evidence for Aspar’s Political Power and Aims in the Last Years of Theodosius II’s Reign

Abstract

The article examines Priscus’s account of the conflict that emerged between the leader of the Roman embassy, Maximinus, and the Hunnic envoy, Berichus. The barbarian got offended by the remarks concerning the lack of competence and influence of Aspar and Areobindus. A detailed analysis of this short passage – entailing the persona of Berichus himself, the reasons for his anger, and the possible explanations for Maximinus’s behaviour – can provide us with evidence regarding the political position of Aspar in the last years of the reign of Theodosius II. Most scholars use this example to illustrate Aspar’s falling out of favour and power; it is more likely, however, that the situation was actually more complex. The political struggle between Chrysaphius, a proponent of the policy of reconciliation with the Huns, and Zeno, the opponent of such policies, makes it far more probable that the government feared that their diplomatic effort might be hijacked by the opposing faction. Therefore, it was political differences – and not the failures in the war of 447 – that were the reason for Aspar’s falling out with the emperor. This would also mean that Zeno and Aspar shared similar views on how to solve the Hunnic problem, which would be the basis for their cooperation, resulting in the overthrowing of Chrysaphius and the crowning of Marcian in 450.

Keywords

Byzantium, Huns, Aspar, Theodosius II, Byzantine foreign policy, Byzantine military elite

Disciplines

Byzantine and Modern Greek | Political History

References

Chronica Gallica a. CCCCLII, [in:] Chronica Gallica, ed. T. Mommsen, Berolini 1892, p. 646–662 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Auctores antiquissimi].

The Chronicle of Marcellinus, ed. et trans. B. Croke, Sydney 1995 [= Byzantina Australiensia, 7].

Chronicon Paschale, vol. I–II, ed. L. Dindorfius, Bonnae 1832 [= Corpus scriptorum historiae byzantinae, 14–15].

The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus, ed. et. trans. M. Whitby, Liverpool 2000 [= Translated Texts for Historians, 33].

Ioannis Malalae Chronographia, rec. I. Thurn, Beriolini–Novi Eboraci 2000 [= Corpus fontium historiae byzantinae. Series Berolinensis, 35].

Iordanes, Romana, [in:] Iordanis Romana et Getica, rec. T. Mommsen, Berolini 1882, p. 1–52 [= Monumenta Germaniae historica, Auctores antiquissimi].

Priscus, Fragmenta, [in:] The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire. Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus, ed. et trans. R.C. Blockley, vol. II, Liverpool 1983, p. 221–401.

Procopius, History of the Wars, vol. II, Books 3–4. (Vandalic War), trans. H.B. Dewing, Cambridge Massachusetts 1916 [= Loeb Classical Library, 81].

Theophanis Chronographia, vol. I–II, rec. C. de Boor, Lipsiae 1883–1885.

Altheim F., Geschichte der Hunnen, vol. IV, 2Berlin 1975.

Bachrach B., A History of the Alans in the West. From Their First Appearance in the Sources of Classical Antiquity through the Early Middle Ages, Minneapolis 1973.

Bleeker R.A., Aspar and Attila: The Role of Flavius Ardaburius Aspar in the Hun Wars of the 440s, “Ancient World” 3, 1980, p. 23–28.

Blockley R.C., East Roman Foreign Policy. Formation and Conduct from Diocletian to Anastasius, Leeds 1992.

Bóna I., Das Hunnenreich, Stuttgart 1991.

Burgess R.W., The Accession of Marcian in the Light of Chalcedonian Apologetic and Monophysite Polemic, “Byzantinische Zeitschrift” 86/87, 1994, p. 27–68.

Burns T.S., A History of the Ostrogoths, Bloomington 1984.

Bury J.B., History of the Later Roman Empire from the Death of Theodosius I to the Death of Justinian, AD 395 to AD 565, London 1923.

Croke B., Anatolius and Nomus: Envoys to Attila, “Byzantinoslavica” 42, 1981, p. 159–170.

Croke B., Dynasty and Ethnicity. Emperor Leo I and the Eclipse of Aspar, “Chiron” 35, 2005, p. 147–203.

Demandt A., Geschichte der Spätantike, 2München 2008 [= Alte Geschichte in Beck’s historischer Bibliothek].

Feld K., Barbarische Bürger. Die Isaurier und das Römische Reich, Berlin 2005.

Gautier E., Genséric. Roi de Carthage, Paris 1951.

Glušanin E.P., Voennaja znat’ rannej Vizantii, Varnaul 1991.

Gordon C.D., The Age of Attila. Fifth-Century Byzantium and the Barbarians, Michigan 1961.

Heather P., Goths and Romans 332–489, Oxford 1991 [= Oxford Historical Monographs].

Hohlfelder R.L., Marcian’s Gamble. A Reassessment of Eastern Imperial Policy toward Attila AD 450–453, “American Journal of Ancient History” 9, 1984, p. 54–69.

Holum K.G., Theodosian Empresses. Women and Imperial Dominion in Late Antiquity, Berkeley–London 1981.

Jones A.H.M., The Later Roman Empire 284–602. A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey, Oxford 1964.

Karayannopulos J., Byzantinische Miszellen, [in:] Studia in honorem Veselini Beševliev, ed. V. Georgiev, Sofia 1978.

Kelly C., Neither Conquest nor Settlement: Attila’s Empire and Its Impact, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Attila, ed. M. Maas, Cambridge 2015 [= Cambridge Companions to the Ancient World], p. 193–208.

Kim H.J., The Huns, Romans and the Birth of Europe, Cambridge 2013.

Kosiński R., The Emperor Zeno. Religion and Politics, trans. M. Fijak, Cracow 2010 [= Byzantina et Slavica Cracoviensia, 6].

Laniado A., Aspar and His Phoideratoi: John Malalas on a Special Relationship, [in:] Governare e riformare l’impero al momento della sua divisione. Oriente, Occidente, Illirico, ed. U. Roberto, L. Mecella, Rome 2016, p. 325–344 [= Collection de l’École française de Rome, 507].

Lee A.D., The Eastern Empire: Theodosius to Anastasius, [in:] Cambridge Ancient History, vol. XIV, ed. A. Cameron, B. Ward-Perkins, M. Whitby, Cambridge 2008, p. 33–62.

Lee A.D., Theodosius and His Generals [in:] Theodosius II. Rethinking the Roman Empire in Late Antiquity, ed. C. Kelly, Cambridge–New York 2013 [= Cambridge Classical Studies], p. 90–108.

Lensky N., Captivity among the Barbarians and Its Impact on the Fate of the Roman Empire, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Attila, ed. M. Maas, Cambridge 2015, p. 230–246.

Maenchen-Helfen O., The World of Huns. Studies in Their History and Culture, ed. M. Knight, Berkeley–London 1973.

McEvoy M., Becoming Roman? The Not-So-Curious Case of Aspar and the Ardaburii, “Journal of Late Antiquity” 9, 2016, p. 483–511.

Prostko-Prostyński J., Attila and Novae, [in:] Novae. Legionary Fortress and Late Antique Town, vol. I, A Companion to the Study of Novae, ed. T. Derda, P. Dyczek, J. Kolendo, Warsaw 2008, p. 133–140.

Rouche M., Attila. La violence nomade, Paris 2009.

Scott L., Aspar and the Burden of Barbarian Heritage, “Byzantine Studies / Études byzantines” 3, 1976, p. 59–69.

Stein E., Histoire du Bas-Empire, Paris 1959.

Stickler T., Aëtius. Gestaltungsspielräume eines Heermeisters im ausgehenden Weströmischen Reich, München 2002.

Stickler T., Die Hunnen, München 2007.

Thompson E.A., The Foreign Policies of Theodosius II and Marcian, “Hermathena” 76, 1950, p. 58–75.

Thompson E.A., A History of Attila and the Huns, Oxford 1948.

Thompson E.A., The Isaurians under Theodosius II, “Hermathena” 48, 1946, p. 18–31.

Tyszkiewicz L., Hunowie w Europie. Ich wpływ na Cesarstwo Wschodnie i Zachodnie oraz na ludy barbarzyńskie, Wrocław 2004 [= Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, 2695].

Urbaniec A., Wpływ patrycjusza Aspara na cesarską elekcję Leona, “U Schyłku Starożytności. Studia Źródłoznawcze” 11, 2011, p. 173–201.

Vernadsky G., Flavius Ardabur Aspar, “Sudost-Forschungen” 6, 1941, p. 38–72.

Vössing K., Das Königreich der Vandalen. Geiserichs Herrschaft und das Imperium Romanum, Darmstadt 2014.

Wilczyński M., Gejzeryk i “czwarta wojna punicka”, Oświęcim 2016.

Wirth G., Attila. Das Hunnenreich und Europa, Stuttgart 1999.

Zuckermann C., L’Empire d’Orient et les Huns. Notes sur Priscus, “Travaux et mémoires du Centre de recherches d’histoire et civilisation byzantines” 12, 1994, p. 159–182.

First Page

237

Last Page

251

Language

eng

Share

COinS